On 11/03/2008, at 5:31 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
It seems to me that we need to process all the relocations and
normalize
an artifact across the spectrum BEFORE we start selecting versions
from
those ranges. This would need to happen across the graph in case there
are conflicts somewhere
e puts a range on
d[1.0,3.0) we would currently stop at 1.2 because that's the last d, but
really e2.0 and e3.0 should be considered the same.
It seems to me that we need to process all the relocations and normalize
an artifact across the spectrum BEFORE we start selecting versions from
those ra
n you upgraded a dependency,
because if you don't touch your pom (unless you use snapshots)
everything would be fine.
Upgrading a dependency can have this kind of consequences, bringing
dependencies to your build that you don't want. Maybe it'd be good
idea to hold relocations until majo
uot;won't fix" and this makes the problem
even harder to solve for users.
fabrizio
tough one ;)
-- Kenney
Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to start a discussion on how relocations in the central
> repo should be handled.
>
> I recently noticed more and more a
he downside is that this breaks old builds, but they probably all have fixed versions anyway. Adding a parameter/argument/sysprop
to override this would at least let people be aware that there can be unexpected
results.
tough one ;)
-- Kenney
Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Hi,
I would like to sta
Hi,
I would like to start a discussion on how relocations in the central
repo should be handled.
I recently noticed more and more artifacts partially relocated in the
repo in case of a new upload. With *partially* relocated I means the
case of a new version of an existing artifact uploaded with
On 1/13/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, that was by me. No idea how it ever worked though, it should be
in , right?
right
On 13/01/2007, at 6:33 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just doing some work on the integration tests and trying to
> automate the installation of th
Yeah, that was by me. No idea how it ever worked though, it should be
in , right?
On 13/01/2007, at 6:33 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Just doing some work on the integration tests and trying to
automate the installation of the support artifacts and I found this:
http://svn.apache.org/rep
Hi,
Just doing some work on the integration tests and trying to automate
the installation of the support artifacts and I found this:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/core-integration-testing/trunk/
core-integration-testing-support/1.1-old-location/pom.xml
Which has a relocation elemen