[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 28 novembre 2007 14:18
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Relocation on a different version
>
> Gilles Scokart wrote:
> > Yes, I understand that someone decided to rename the version number.
> >
> &
Gilles Scokart wrote:
> Yes, I understand that someone decided to rename the version number.
>
> My problem is that I don't know how to consider the version number in the
> conflict resolution. If I consider the
> version number of the relocated module or the version number of the 'target
> of
Carlos
> > Sanchez
> > Sent: mercredi 28 novembre 2007 11:40
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Relocation on a different version
> >
> > that was because it was published under two different versions, so one
> > wa
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Relocation on a different version
>
> that was because it was published under two different versions, so one
> was relocated to the correct one. Not common though
>
> On Nov 28, 2007 6:38 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTE
t; From: Gilles Scokart
> > Sent: vendredi 23 novembre 2007 9:01
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: Relocation on a different version
> >
> >
> > Is it allowed to relocate a module to itself by only changing the version
> > number? This l
> -Original Message-
> From: Gilles Scokart
> Sent: vendredi 23 novembre 2007 9:01
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Relocation on a different version
>
>
> Is it allowed to relocate a module to itself by only changing the version
> number? Th
