Sure, I'll give it a try tomorrow.
On 2012-11-04 18:40, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Dennis, could you add an IT for it? It seems to be more of a coincidence
> that it was fixed, and we don't want such regression again, right?
>
> With the IT MPLUGIN-223 can be closed.
>
> Op Sun, 04 Nov 2012 18:34:1
+1
there is sufficient change to deserve a 3.2
I'm switching Jira and svn
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 4 novembre 2012 17:51:42 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit :
> The dependency change alone should be sufficient for 3.2
>
> Kristian
>
> Den 4. nov. 2012 kl. 16:57 skrev Dennis Lundberg :
> > Hi
> >
Dennis, could you add an IT for it? It seems to be more of a coincidence
that it was fixed, and we don't want such regression again, right?
With the IT MPLUGIN-223 can be closed.
Op Sun, 04 Nov 2012 18:34:15 +0100 schreef Dennis Lundberg
:
On 2012-11-04 17:59, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi,
On 2012-11-04 17:59, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wasn't aware of this issue, neither of the extractors-property.
> Right now I let the plugin check for the maven-plugin-annotations
> dependency.
> If I can get the same information from the pluginDescriptor, the code
> can be simplified.
> Is
Hi,
I wasn't aware of this issue, neither of the extractors-property.
Right now I let the plugin check for the maven-plugin-annotations
dependency.
If I can get the same information from the pluginDescriptor, the code can
be simplified.
Is it really the same thing?
Robert
Op Sun, 04 Nov 20
The dependency change alone should be sufficient for 3.2
Kristian
Den 4. nov. 2012 kl. 16:57 skrev Dennis Lundberg :
> Hi
>
> Looking at the road map in JIRA, I think the next release should be 3.2
> since we have some improvements now.
>
> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLUGIN#selectedTab=co
Hi
Looking at the road map in JIRA, I think the next release should be 3.2
since we have some improvements now.
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLUGIN#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aroadmap-panel
WDYT?
On 2012-10-29 18:21, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> I'm fixing MPLUGIN
Hi
It seems to me that Robert fixed
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLUGIN-223
when he fixed
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPLUGIN-231
Should I close MPLUGIN-223 as a duplicate?
On 2012-11-02 22:48, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> i'll wait for something good ;)
>
> K
>
> Den 2. nov. 2012 kl.
I'm done with MPLUGIN-227, which was my favorite :)
Regards,
Hervé
Le lundi 29 octobre 2012 18:21:53 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit :
> I'm fixing MPLUGIN-229. If anyone else wants to hack away at
> something, now is the time to start ;)
>
> I'll start the release in a day or so unless someone want
i'll wait for something good ;)
K
Den 2. nov. 2012 kl. 22:30 skrev Dennis Lundberg :
> On 2012-11-02 17:50, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>> I'm done with MPLUGIN-229, which basically means plugin-tools no
>> longer imposes a plexus-utils dependency
>> (or any other dependency!) on the generated plu
On 2012-11-02 17:50, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> I'm done with MPLUGIN-229, which basically means plugin-tools no
> longer imposes a plexus-utils dependency
> (or any other dependency!) on the generated plugins any more.
>
> Dennis; MPLUGIN-223 looks really neat, and would make /sweet/ release.
>
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/QDOX/fixforversion/18944
I'll go through the bugs fixed in 2.0, to see which ones are
worth/possible to add to 1.12.1 as well.
It should be possible to have this version in Maven Central this Sunday.
Robert
Op Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:50:07 +0100 schreef Kristian
I'm done with MPLUGIN-229, which basically means plugin-tools no
longer imposes a plexus-utils dependency
(or any other dependency!) on the generated plugins any more.
Dennis; MPLUGIN-223 looks really neat, and would make /sweet/ release.
How does your timeline look ?
Robert; is there any progress
I'll let this slide towards (and maybe over) the weekend and I'll ping
you guys about status then.
Kristian
2012/10/29 Dennis Lundberg :
> Hi
>
> I'd like to take a look at MPLUGIN-223, if I can only find some time for
> it. I'm currently knee-deep in Assembly plugin.
>
> On 2012-10-29 18:21, Kr
Hi
I'd like to take a look at MPLUGIN-223, if I can only find some time for
it. I'm currently knee-deep in Assembly plugin.
On 2012-10-29 18:21, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
> I'm fixing MPLUGIN-229. If anyone else wants to hack away at
> something, now is the time to start ;)
>
> I'll start the re
I could create a 1.12.1 version of QDox, where I can include patches which
I already added to the 2.0-version.
This way MPLUGIN-220 can be fixed.
Are you in a real hurry?
Robert
Op Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:21:53 +0100 schreef Kristian Rosenvold
:
I'm fixing MPLUGIN-229. If anyone else wants t
16 matches
Mail list logo
