Strange. I've checked the maven-scm released artifacts and they seem
okay, thanks for the heads up though.
Mark
On 31 October 2012 20:38, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> yes, I meant SCM-698. It's really weird what happened, because I would
> expect tests to fail if there's no components.x
Hi Mark,
yes, I meant SCM-698. It's really weird what happened, because I would
expect tests to fail if there's no components.xml. It happened to me only
once, during the most critical moment: release:perform. Just double check
your release, that's all I'm saying.
Robert
Op Tue, 30 Oct 2
Hi Robert,
Is this in reference to SCM-698 which switched from
plexus-maven-plugin to plexus-component-metadata? The latter plugin
still correctly generates the plexus components.xml files for
maven-scm. Perhaps the maven-invoker problem is specific to plexus
annotations which I don't believe we
Mark,
FYI, it seems like there's an issue with the plexus-component-metadata.
My latest release is of the maven-invoker is missing the
plexus/components.xml so I'll have to re-release a new one as soon as I
know what the issue is.
Running a package twice does generate the file.
I assume it'
Sounds reasonable to me, I'll release it as 1.8.1.
Mark
On 27 October 2012 23:28, Chris Graham wrote:
> 1.9 or 1.8.1?
>
> It doesn't appear to be a major change.
>
> -Chris
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 27/10/2012, at 11:31 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
>
>> On 26 October 2012 21:14, Olivier Lamy wr
1.9 or 1.8.1?
It doesn't appear to be a major change.
-Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On 27/10/2012, at 11:31 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
> On 26 October 2012 21:14, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2012/10/26 Mark Hobson :
>>> Any objections before I start a vote?
>> Nope
>
> Great, I'll get the ball rolling
On 26 October 2012 21:14, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/10/26 Mark Hobson :
>> Any objections before I start a vote?
> Nope
Great, I'll get the ball rolling.
>> Also, what is the convention for running maven-scm ITs? I'm guessing
>> it's done manually prior to releasing. Does it require all the S
2012/10/26 Mark Hobson :
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release maven-scm-publish-plugin 1.0-beta-2 for the
> MSCMPUB-2 fix. This issue is in turn fixed by SCM-697 so I'll also
> need to release maven-scm 1.9. The remaining issue scheduled for 1.9
> is SCM-435 which I can move to 1.10 instead.
>
> Any obj
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-scm-publish-plugin 1.0-beta-2 for the
MSCMPUB-2 fix. This issue is in turn fixed by SCM-697 so I'll also
need to release maven-scm 1.9. The remaining issue scheduled for 1.9
is SCM-435 which I can move to 1.10 instead.
Any objections before I start a vote?
Also, w
