On Dec 2, 2007 4:27 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know the discussion in august about this question:
> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r564483maven-project-KEYS-tf4257727s177.html#a12116843
>
> I just want to double-check it is really ok before doing anything.
It'
Yep, go for it :)
On 03/12/2007, at 10:27 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Hi,
Code in svn is ready to be released.
I'm committer, not PMC member.
Any objection if I prepare the release using instructions on
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html and call
for a
vote?
I know the
Hi,
Code in svn is ready to be released.
I'm committer, not PMC member.
Any objection if I prepare the release using instructions on
http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html and call for a
vote?
I know the discussion in august about this question:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-
On 1 Apr 07, at 10:17 AM 1 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 02/04/2007, at 12:07 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 01/04/2007, at 11:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1 Apr 07, at 9:41 AM 1 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
I still find the versioning confusing, even if the artifact ID
has changed. This
On 1 Apr 07, at 10:07 AM 1 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 01/04/2007, at 11:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1 Apr 07, at 9:41 AM 1 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
I still find the versioning confusing, even if the artifact ID
has changed. This seems like it should be 2.1 to me
2.1 or 2.0.6?
On 02/04/2007, at 12:07 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 01/04/2007, at 11:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1 Apr 07, at 9:41 AM 1 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
I still find the versioning confusing, even if the artifact ID
has changed. This seems like it should be 2.1 to me
2.1 or 2.0.6? These a
On 01/04/2007, at 11:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1 Apr 07, at 9:41 AM 1 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
I still find the versioning confusing, even if the artifact ID has
changed. This seems like it should be 2.1 to me
2.1 or 2.0.6? These are matched against 2.0.6. Is the confusion not
ma
On 1 Apr 07, at 9:41 AM 1 Apr 07, Brett Porter wrote:
I still find the versioning confusing, even if the artifact ID has
changed. This seems like it should be 2.1 to me
2.1 or 2.0.6? These are matched against 2.0.6. Is the confusion not
matching the version against the base release of Mave
I still find the versioning confusing, even if the artifact ID has
changed. This seems like it should be 2.1 to me (with the features
added in those patches) if it is going down the separate version path.
As for inclusions, I couldn't find the issue, though was sure there
was one, to make i
Hi,
I've synced up the Ant Tasks with the 2.0.6 release and picked a few
issues that people have provided patches for:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
reset=true&&pid=11533&resolution=-1&fixfor=13337&sorter/
field=priority&sorter/order=DESC
The rest of the issues are
10 matches
Mail list logo
