after my message, there are many issues that have been modified to target Doxia
1.9.1, but no sign of work on them: assigning an issue to a version means
working on it.
If I see no sign of work on these issues, I will postpone them and do the
release (then Doxia Sitetools, then Maven Site Plugin
we fixed a few issues, not so many, but important ones that are expected for
the next Maven Site Plugin release
Any additional issues one wants to fix before I do the release?
Regards,
Hervé
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 21 Aug 07, at 6:05 PM 21 Aug 07, Brett Porter wrote:
To date, I have always been in favour of one trunk, and one version.
I understand the need for a clear separate and for Doxia to be useful
without the site tools, but I don't think separating the releases was
the r
On 19/02/2007, at 12:41 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
When we have two release for which we don't have to change the API.
+ decent test coverage, api and usage documentation (as these 3
things all tie you to the above, I think).
Which will require some scrutiny of what is currently there. Th
On 18 Feb 07, at 7:26 AM 18 Feb 07, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi Jason,
2007/2/17, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Can folks take a look at:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/doxia
I will try to do it this week.
And see if there are any pressing issues for 1.0-alpha-9 as I would
like
Hi Jason,
2007/2/17, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Can folks take a look at:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/doxia
I will try to do it this week.
And see if there are any pressing issues for 1.0-alpha-9 as I would
like to release it so that I can fix and release the site plugin.
Hi,
Can folks take a look at:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/doxia
And see if there are any pressing issues for 1.0-alpha-9 as I would
like to release it so that I can fix and release the site plugin.
Thanks,
Jason.
-
