lopers List
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Release of Maven Sources Plugin 2.3
>
> Ooo. Findbugs does some serious good stuff; Look at this violation in
> "FileUtils";
>
> https://analysis.apache.org/drilldown/violations/12409?
Ooo. Findbugs does some serious good stuff; Look at this violation in
"FileUtils";
https://analysis.apache.org/drilldown/violations/12409?rids%5B%5D=103768&rids%5B%5D=103771&rule=findbugs%3ARCN_REDUNDANT_NULLCHECK_OF_NONNULL_VALUE&rule_sev=CRITICAL#
Which raises the question; I would never be abl
While improving this, also have a look at
https://analysis.apache.org/drilldown/violations/org.apache.maven.shared:maven-shared-aggregator?
maven-shared-utils is by far the project with the most violations...
Robert
Op Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:19:40 +0200 schreef Olivier Lamy :
2012/10/8 Robert Sc
2012/10/8 Robert Scholte :
> Op Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:17:38 +0200 schreef Olivier Lamy :
>
>
>> 2012/10/7 Robert Scholte :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm having a look at the shared-utils and some tests fail under Windows.
>>> So
>>> those need to be fixed first.
>>> I'm working on that.
>>
>> Good luck :P
Op Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:17:38 +0200 schreef Olivier Lamy :
2012/10/7 Robert Scholte :
Hi,
I'm having a look at the shared-utils and some tests fail under
Windows. So
those need to be fixed first.
I'm working on that.
Good luck :P
We can probably setup Jenkins to run this on the windauze nod
2012/10/7 Robert Scholte :
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a look at the shared-utils and some tests fail under Windows. So
> those need to be fixed first.
> I'm working on that.
Good luck :P
We can probably setup Jenkins to run this on the windauze node too ?
>
> Also I'd like discuss if we should remove dep
Hi,
I'm having a look at the shared-utils and some tests fail under Windows.
So those need to be fixed first.
I'm working on that.
Also I'd like discuss if we should remove deprecated classes and methods
and optimize method signatures.
Since we're starting with a new artifact there's no bac
+1 for the release.
Arnaud
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Ok, I missed this in the revisions mentioned in Jira.
> I'm fine with it.
>
> Robert
>
> Op Thu, 04 Oct 2012 21:14:09 +0200 schreef Olivier Lamy >:
>
>
> 2012/10/4 Robert Scholte :
>>
>>> Since this is a blocke
Ok, I missed this in the revisions mentioned in Jira.
I'm fine with it.
Robert
Op Thu, 04 Oct 2012 21:14:09 +0200 schreef Olivier Lamy :
2012/10/4 Robert Scholte :
Since this is a blocker, where's the unit test or IT?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-source-plugin/s
2012/10/4 Robert Scholte :
> Since this is a blocker, where's the unit test or IT?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-source-plugin/src/it/MSOURCES-62/
>
> Op Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:19:51 +0200 schreef Olivier Lamy :
>
>
>> Hi,
>> There is a blocker issue http://jira.codehaus.
Since this is a blocker, where's the unit test or IT?
Op Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:19:51 +0200 schreef Olivier Lamy :
Hi,
There is a blocker issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSOURCES-62
The plugin has some SNAPSHOT dependencies I need to release too.
* maven-archiver
* maven-shared-utils
So I w
Hi,
There is a blocker issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSOURCES-62
The plugin has some SNAPSHOT dependencies I need to release too.
* maven-archiver
* maven-shared-utils
So I will release all.
Objections ?
Thanks
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | h
12 matches
Mail list logo