As per https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/40 - is there anything else
we’d like to get into the next release? There are currently some unreleased bug
fixes on master that it seems a shame not to push out.
Nick
Yes, and sorry again for a bit of hectic handling of this.
After I triggered the vote on Friday, over the weekend I realised I want
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINDEXER-62
in too, but was unable to sit in front of my machine (kids and family
programme). As MINDEXER-62 it introduces a new art
Ok. Fair enough. :-)
-Chris
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2012, at 00:42, Chris Graham wrote:
>
> > If the vote has been held and passed, can you withdraw it? I didn't think
> > that you could.
>
> FWIW, from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html:
>
On 18 Sep 2012, at 00:42, Chris Graham wrote:
> If the vote has been held and passed, can you withdraw it? I didn't think
> that you could.
FWIW, from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html:
"Generally the community will cancel the release vote if anyone identifies
serious problems, bu
If the vote has been held and passed, can you withdraw it? I didn't think
that you could.
-Chris
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Yup, I realised this too late, that am at wrong thread. Sorry about the
> confusion.
>
> Anyway, I am withdrawing the vote anyway.
>
>
> Than
Yup, I realised this too late, that am at wrong thread. Sorry about the
confusion.
Anyway, I am withdrawing the vote anyway.
Thanks,
~t~
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> AFAIK vote thread is here http://markmail.org/message/hcrmm2v3pumhzwnh
> And PASSED !!!
>
> IMHO H
AFAIK vote thread is here http://markmail.org/message/hcrmm2v3pumhzwnh
And PASSED !!!
IMHO Here was a thread discussion not a vote.
2012/9/17 Tamás Cservenák :
> Thanks for everyone participating this forum and hijacking the voting!
>
> I call this vote closed and failed failed: no votes happened
Thanks for everyone participating this forum and hijacking the voting!
I call this vote closed and failed failed: no votes happened at
all. Binaries are dropped, will rollback the SVN too in any moment.
Thanks,
~t~
On Thu, September 13, 2012 7:05 pm, Chris Graham wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Manfred Moser
> wrote:
>> I think that the cost is only so high because companies keep waiting
>> until
>> it is too painful. If you constantly keep upgrading a bit here and there
>> and stay up to date with
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:04:09PM -0700, Manfred Moser wrote:
> > On Wed, September 12, 2012 6:06 pm, Chris Graham wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Anders Hammar
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I fully agree with you and I'm actually of
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Manfred Moser wrote:
> On Wed, September 12, 2012 6:06 pm, Chris Graham wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Anders Hammar
> wrote:
> >
> >> I fully agree with you and I'm actually of the opinion that the Java
> >> community has a responsibility to provide
On Thu, September 13, 2012 6:52 am, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:04:09PM -0700, Manfred Moser wrote:
>> I think that the cost is only so high because companies keep waiting
>> until
>> it is too painful. If you constantly keep upgrading a bit here and there
>> and stay up to da
13, 2012 4:52:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Release of Maven Indexer 5.0
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:04:09PM -0700, Manfred Moser wrote:
> > On Wed, September 12, 2012 6:06 pm, Chris Graham wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Anders Hammar
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:04:09PM -0700, Manfred Moser wrote:
> On Wed, September 12, 2012 6:06 pm, Chris Graham wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> >
> >> I fully agree with you and I'm actually of the opinion that the Java
> >> community has a responsibility to pr
That's exactly what I think too!!
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Manfred Moser"
> To: "Maven Developers List"
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 7:04:09 AM
> Subject: Re: Release of Maven Indexer 5.0
&g
On Wed, September 12, 2012 6:06 pm, Chris Graham wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
>
>> I fully agree with you and I'm actually of the opinion that the Java
>> community has a responsibility to provide enough reasons for those on
>> older Java platforms to upgrade. But
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> I fully agree with you and I'm actually of the opinion that the Java
> community has a responsibility to provide enough reasons for those on
> older Java platforms to upgrade. But as long as we provide libraries
>
Simple.
Two reasons actua
the usual operations like indexing local repo, downloding remote index
and searching appear all working properly.
I had to change a place or two to call aquire+release methods on the context.
Milos
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Tamás Cs
Yup IMHO most of Maven indexer "users" are ide and/or repository
managers (most are probably already 1.6 required)
So perso I don't have any issues regarding moving to 1.6 required.
2012/9/12 Milos Kleint :
> if it matters, netbeans (the user the library is on 1.6 for a while
> already), no proble
if it matters, netbeans (the user the library is on 1.6 for a while
already), no problems whatsoever upgrading..
Milos
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Actually, my hope was to have someone here say "c'mon, not bumping to
> Java6? Are you nuts?" and then continue with, "
I fully agree with you and I'm actually of the opinion that the Java
community has a responsibility to provide enough reasons for those on
older Java platforms to upgrade. But as long as we provide libraries
etc that are Java 1.4 compatible, there might not be enough reasons.
I'm sure there are lot
Actually, my hope was to have someone here say "c'mon, not bumping to
Java6? Are you nuts?" and then continue with, "listen, you code _today_
something that will be hopefully used 3-4 years from today. But, you are
_prevented_ to leave something that is already dead _today_ for 3 years
(will be 6-7
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Milos,
>
> yes I think it is, since all of it is _removed_. See issue
> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINDEXER-57
> and related commits.
>
> Only integration I tested is... Nexus. So, you could give it a spin in NB
> for example...
I'm
Thats' good :)
But seriously, there are two related commits (one doing it, and one undoing
it). All I wanted it to simply cover those and have a history for that
change in JIRA too
Thanks,
~t~
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> Should MINDEXER-60 really have a fix ve
Milos,
yes I think it is, since all of it is _removed_. See issue
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINDEXER-57
and related commits.
Only integration I tested is... Nexus. So, you could give it a spin in NB
for example...
Thanks,
~t~
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
> hey,
hey,
do you believe https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MINDEXER-52 is fixed in 5.0?
Milos
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> there are a notable changes in trunk of MI:
> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MINDEX
Should MINDEXER-60 really have a fix version as it is won't fix? It
could trick people just browsing the list of tickets associated with
this relaese to think this has been introduced.
/Anders
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> there are a notable changes in tr
Howdy,
there are a notable changes in trunk of MI:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+MINDEXER+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%225.0.0%22+AND+status+%3D+Closed+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC
https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/commits/trunk?page=1
So, I'd like
28 matches
Mail list logo
