Am 2023-06-06 um 20:40 schrieb Eric Lilja:
I didn't know that the datetime string in _remote.repositories was an
artifact of the behavior of a JDK class (or Properties.store(), more
specifically). Interesting. That also implies it is not processed by
anything. Thanks.
It has been a pain in the
I didn't know that the datetime string in _remote.repositories was an
artifact of the behavior of a JDK class (or Properties.store(), more
specifically). Interesting. That also implies it is not processed by
anything. Thanks.
- Eric L
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 6:30 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 20
Am 2023-06-06 um 14:14 schrieb Eric Lilja:
Hello everyone, the timestamp (e.g., #Tue Jun 06 01:59:04 CEST 2023) in the
_remote.repositories file, is that just for human consumption or is it
processed? If only as a courtesy for humans, can its generation be disabled
somehow?
5 seconds of Google:
Hello everyone, the timestamp (e.g., #Tue Jun 06 01:59:04 CEST 2023) in the
_remote.repositories file, is that just for human consumption or is it
processed? If only as a courtesy for humans, can its generation be disabled
somehow?
Best regards,
Eric Lilja
