Le dimanche 23 novembre 2014 10:27:12 Michael Osipov a écrit :
> Am 2014-11-23 um 03:42 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
> > IMHO, just open another Jira issue and make the proper fix (with existing
> > ITs)
> I head this in my too, the question is. How do we want to unify that.
>
> Do we want everywhere:
>
Am 2014-11-23 um 03:42 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
IMHO, just open another Jira issue and make the proper fix (with existing ITs)
I head this in my too, the question is. How do we want to unify that.
Do we want everywhere:
g:a:v or Unnamed -- g:a:v?
That would count for the module report as well
List"
> > Betreff: Re: r1639526 in maven-project-info-reports breaks the build
> >
> > fixed
> >
> > was both:
> > 1. an existing IT weakness (missing distributionManagement section, which
> > cannot exist in real use case): I fixed the IT
>
>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 22. November 2014 um 19:02 Uhr
> Von: "Hervé BOUTEMY"
> An: "Maven Developers List"
> Betreff: Re: r1639526 in maven-project-info-reports breaks the build
>
> fixed
>
> was both:
> 1. an existing IT weakness (missing distri
fixed
was both:
1. an existing IT weakness (missing distributionManagement section, which
cannot exist in real use case): I fixed the IT
2. and a change in output in case no name defined in module pom: I reverted to
previous algorithm (use artifactId) instead of ugly "Unnamed g:a:v"
Regards,
