Re: maven-3.x-next

2025-01-24 Thread Manfred Moser
Maybe it would be good to prefix all branches the the github names of owners.. at least it is easier to find the person then to figure out next steps.. For existing branches.. maybe check who the last committer was.. Manfred On 2025-01-24 4:37 a.m., Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: Just trying t

Re: maven-3.x-next

2025-01-24 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Maybe you're using the wrong tools ? Here's my workflow: * create a branch locally * commit the modifications to your local branch * go to terminal and run `gh pr create`, give the few informations needed, and done The first time, it will ask which repo you want to use to create PR, it even pro

Re: maven-3.x-next

2025-01-24 Thread Xeno Amess
PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: maven-3.x-next not Elli's fault,github is somehow broken at repo manage system... There SHALL have ability to make repo group,and in each group allow same-name repos...like what gitlab did. but now we can only use multi account, or lots of on

Re: maven-3.x-next

2025-01-24 Thread Xeno Amess
Amess From: Xeno Amess Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 9:04:42 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: maven-3.x-next not Elli's fault,github is somehow broken at repo manage system... There SHALL have anility to make repo group,and in each group allow damr-na

Re: maven-3.x-next

2025-01-24 Thread Xeno Amess
Amess From: Tamás Cservenák Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 8:59:28 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: maven-3.x-next I really wonder what will some new Elliotte in near or far future say about branches named "utils", "unused", "mdo", "

Re: maven-3.x-next

2025-01-24 Thread Tamás Cservenák
I really wonder what will some new Elliotte in near or far future say about branches named "utils", "unused", "mdo", "apidoc" and "qube" say... At _least_ use MNG- name to have some link to the issue. This, what you do now, makes the canonical repo look as your own private sandbox. https://git

Re: maven-3.x-next

2025-01-24 Thread Xeno Amess
Oh Gary sometimes you are just too mean (btw I strongly suggest fork.) 发件人: Gary Gregory 发送时间: 星期五, 一月 24, 2025 8:45:22 下午 收件人: Maven Developers List 主题: Re: maven-3.x-next Thank for bringing a smile to my face this morning. Gary On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 07:28

Re: maven-3.x-next

2025-01-24 Thread Gary Gregory
Thank for bringing a smile to my face this morning. Gary On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, 07:28 Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Howdy, > > So let me get this straight: you are now suffering from > "unknown branches and/or junkyard of branches in canonical repo"? > While you still refuse to use forks? > > T >

Re: maven-3.x-next

2025-01-24 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
Just trying to do a little cleanup. And no, I'm not going to use forks. I tried that again, and they still add multiple extra steps compared to using branches. We've got enough work to do not to waste time on less efficient tools and processes. On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:26 PM Tamás Cservenák w

Re: maven-3.x-next

2025-01-24 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Howdy, So let me get this straight: you are now suffering from "unknown branches and/or junkyard of branches in canonical repo"? While you still refuse to use forks? T On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > > Can I delete the maven-3.x-next branch in the github repo