p in plugin version. WDYT?
>
> Michael
>
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Oktober 2014 um 15:23 Uhr
> > Von: "Stephen Connolly"
> > An: "Maven Developers List"
> > Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Re: Maven plugin naming pattern
> >
> > That was the plan..
t; An: "Maven Developers List"
> Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Re: Maven plugin naming pattern
>
> That was the plan 3 years ago we decided to warn first and then switch
> on failing after a while... now is a good time, perhaps you could commit
> the change to fail the build?
>
>
That was the plan 3 years ago we decided to warn first and then switch
on failing after a while... now is a good time, perhaps you could commit
the change to fail the build?
On 10 October 2014 13:48, Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Yes, resposibility isn't always good.
>
> Should
Yes, resposibility isn't always good.
Shouldn't simply make the build fail instead of log when such a collision
happens?
Michael
> Thankfully for you, you are not on the PMC... if you were on the PMC and
> you did such a search you would then have to go and send C&Ds.
>
> /me runs away from th
Thankfully for you, you are not on the PMC... if you were on the PMC and
you did such a search you would then have to go and send C&Ds.
/me runs away from this thread in case I happen to be made aware of any
trademark misuse ;-)
On 10 October 2014 13:39, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Yes
>
> On 10
Yes
On 10 October 2014 13:12, Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote:
> If you do a quick search on Central, you'll that even other Apache project
> don't adhere to this convention. Should they receive a C&D too?
>
> Michael
>
> > We just need to show best effort to defend our trademark... if
If you do a quick search on Central, you'll that even other Apache project
don't adhere to this convention. Should they receive a C&D too?
Michael
> We just need to show best effort to defend our trademark... if we *see*
> anyone doing that then we have to send them C&D letters...
>
> Note: my u
