Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-15 Thread Gerd Aschemann
> On 14. Dec 2024, at 18:16, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 at 12:12, Gerd Aschemann wrote: >> >> I see some drawbacks >> >> Before opening a new issue, I would like to search for similar issues (and >> in particular if there are already solutions, workarcounds, more inf

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-15 Thread Matthias Bünger
Hi, thank you for your summary, which contains every  argument I think. I'm with you and ask for a vote. We all know by the req. Java version discussion where this will lead if we don't do this (seenoevil) Am 15.12.2024 um 19:11 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: Hi, I try summary our discussion a

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-15 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Hi, I try summary our discussion about Switch issues to GitHub, so: At beginning we have a propositions: 1/ try to migrate issues and make JIRA read only 2/ make all our JIRA projects unable to create new issues and new issues would be raised on GH 3/ do not change JIRA but slowly switch to GH

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-14 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 at 12:12, Gerd Aschemann wrote: > > I see some drawbacks > > Before opening a new issue, I would like to search for similar issues (and in > particular if there are already solutions, workarcounds, more information > about the environment etc.). Where should I search? First d

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-13 Thread Gerd Aschemann
I see some drawbacks Before opening a new issue, I would like to search for similar issues (and in particular if there are already solutions, workarcounds, more information about the environment etc.). Where should I search? First du a Jira search, then a GitHub search? If I find something in

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-09 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 at 18:11, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > > How about generating the changelog from the PRs themselves? > > https://github.com/apache/uima-parent-pom/blob/main/pom.xml#L1002-L1071 > It can be next discussion how to technically generate release notes - in many Maven project

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-09 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I do agree. The real work is doing some triage between sections such as: major changes, bug fixes, dependency updates, build related stuff. Basically, listing most important things at the beginning, and minor things at the end on the GitHub release page. GitHub does a nice thing at generating a sk

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-09 Thread Richard Eckart de Castilho
How about generating the changelog from the PRs themselves? https://github.com/apache/uima-parent-pom/blob/main/pom.xml#L1002-L1071 -- Richard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-09 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 at 23:03, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 9:47 PM Slawomir Jaranowski > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I see that more and more PR are not connected to Jira issues ... > > So we simply take a decision and formally accept what we do > > > > I think that might

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-09 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
tldr; when every JIra issue goes into the release notes, PRs that don't belong in the release notes should not have Jira issues. On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 10:11 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > Le dim. 8 déc. 2024 à 23:03, Elliotte Rusty Harold a > écrit : > > > On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 9:47 PM Slawomir

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-08 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Le dim. 8 déc. 2024 à 23:03, Elliotte Rusty Harold a écrit : > On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 9:47 PM Slawomir Jaranowski > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I see that more and more PR are not connected to Jira issues ... > > So we simply take a decision and formally accept what we do > > > > I think that mig

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-08 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 9:47 PM Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > Hi, > > I see that more and more PR are not connected to Jira issues ... > So we simply take a decision and formally accept what we do > I think that might be simply related to what the PRs do. Accrual bug fix and new feature PRs are

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-08 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Hi, I see that more and more PR are not connected to Jira issues ... So we simply take a decision and formally accept what we do On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 at 11:27, Gerd Aschemann wrote: > > For the sake of completeness: I asked Chris Dutz whether he was aware of > other ASF projects moving from Jira

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-08 Thread Gerd Aschemann
For the sake of completeness: I asked Chris Dutz whether he was aware of other ASF projects moving from Jira to GH issues. * He performed such migration for the PLC4X project (but didn’t leave any tools to automate that?). Here is a sample for a migrated issue: https://github.com/apache/plc4x/i

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-07 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Lets start discuss about convention https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/588 On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 19:45, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm for #2 > - simply add issues to GitHub, disable the creation of new issues in jira. > - I know that we have many projects ... but we should do

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues

2024-12-04 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski
Hi, I'm for #2 - simply add issues to GitHub, disable the creation of new issues in jira. - I know that we have many projects ... but we should do it one by one - if project contains not many open issues we can make it read-only at all we also need a conventions for GitHub issues like is for Jira