Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement/Archiving maven-project-utils

+1 retire On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 at 03:17, Matthias Bünger wrote: > > Hi everyone, > during migration from JIRA to GitHub we noticed that the mentioned > component is no longer used, but was not fully archived. While (in > difference to plugins) there is no strict plan how to retire components, > bu

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement/Archiving maven-artifact-transfer

+1 On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 at 03:14, Matthias Bünger wrote: > > Hi everyone, > during migration from JIRA to GitHub we noticed that the mentioned > component is no longer used, but was not fully archived. While (in > difference to plugins) there is no strict plan how to retire components, > but the c

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement/Archiving Maven Default Skin

+1 On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 at 03:18, Matthias Bünger wrote: > > Hi everyone, > during migration from JIRA to GitHub we noticed that the mentioned > component is no longer used, but was not fully archived. While (in > difference to plugins) there is no strict plan how to retire components, > but the c

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

that project "causing" MC lost > > > native access to it (while with Nx2 ran OSS/S01 you could use > > > m-deploy-p just fine, from now on, you cannot). > > > > > > Hence, there is no "native" or "out of the box" support for publ

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement/Archiving maven-project-utils

+1 to retire Guillaume Nodet Le sam. 19 juil. 2025 à 14:47, Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > +1 for retire > > On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 at 19:17, Matthias Bünger wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > during migration from JIRA to GitHub we noticed that the mentioned > > componen

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement/Archiving maven-artifact-transfer

Agreed Guillaume Nodet Le sam. 19 juil. 2025 à 14:43, Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > +1 > > Make it officially retired > > On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 at 19:14, Matthias Bünger wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > during migration from JIRA to GitHub we noticed that the mentione

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement/Archiving maven-project-utils

+1 for retire On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 at 19:17, Matthias Bünger wrote: > > Hi everyone, > during migration from JIRA to GitHub we noticed that the mentioned > component is no longer used, but was not fully archived. While (in > difference to plugins) there is no strict plan how to retire components,

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement/Archiving Maven Default Skin

+1 for retire On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 at 19:17, Matthias Bünger wrote: > > Hi everyone, > during migration from JIRA to GitHub we noticed that the mentioned > component is no longer used, but was not fully archived. While (in > difference to plugins) there is no strict plan how to retire components,

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement/Archiving maven-artifact-transfer

+1 Make it officially retired On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 at 19:14, Matthias Bünger wrote: > > Hi everyone, > during migration from JIRA to GitHub we noticed that the mentioned > component is no longer used, but was not fully archived. While (in > difference to plugins) there is no strict plan how to re

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement/Archiving maven-mapping

Thank you, so this repository must be migrated. Matthias Am 15.07.2025 um 20:27 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: -1 it is used in war and ear plugins also we can find https://github.com/search?q=%22%3CartifactId%3Emaven-mapping%3C%2FartifactId%3E%22+language%3A%22Maven+POM%22++NOT+is%3Aarchived&t

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

t of the box" support for publishing > > for Maven right now. > > > > As you know, there are some solutions offered, that are all > > problematic for me as well: > > - they either "reinvent" (or force you to) reconfigure whole world again > > - or

RE: Re: Proposal: Display dependency checksums (SHA hashes) in maven-dependency-plugin

Excellent news on the trusted checksums feature! As this appears to be provided by Maven itself (in 3.9 onward?), is this the recommended way for teams to version Maven checksums in git? If so, is more documentation planned/needed? Perhaps what is missing in maven-dependency-plugin is machine-read

Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement/Archiving maven-mapping

-1 it is used in war and ear plugins also we can find https://github.com/search?q=%22%3CartifactId%3Emaven-mapping%3C%2FartifactId%3E%22+language%3A%22Maven+POM%22++NOT+is%3Aarchived&type=code&l=Maven+POM https://github.com/search?q=import++org.apache.maven.shared.mapping++NOT+is%3Aarchived&type

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.11

+1 Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix Regards, Hervé Le samedi 12 juillet 2025, 20:58:23 CEST Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 14 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=milestone%3A3.9.11 > > Changes since the last release: > https://g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 3.6.1

+1 Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix Regards, Hervé Le samedi 12 juillet 2025, 19:29:40 CEST Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 11 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/issues?q=milestone%3A3.6.1 > > Changes since the last release: > h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.11

+1 (not binding) NetBeans tests are green -mbien On 7/12/25 20:58, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 14 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=milestone%3A3.9.11 > > Changes since the last release: > https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/maven-3.9.10...maven-3.9.11 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.11

+1 On Sun, 13 Jul 2025 at 04:58, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > Hi, > > We solved 14 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=milestone%3A3.9.11 > > Changes since the last release: > https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/maven-3.9.10...maven-3.9.11 > > Dev dist directory (binaries and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 3.6.1

+1 On Sun, 13 Jul 2025 at 03:30, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > Hi, > > We solved 11 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/issues?q=milestone%3A3.6.1 > > Changes since the last release: > https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/compare/enforcer-3.6.0...enforcer-3.6.1 > > Staging rep

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 3.6.1

+1 On 2025/07/12 17:29:40 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 11 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/issues?q=milestone%3A3.6.1 > > Changes since the last release: > https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/compare/enforcer-3.6.0...enforcer-3.6.1 > > Staging repo: > ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.11

+1 Delany On Sat, 12 Jul 2025 at 20:58, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 14 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=milestone%3A3.9.11 > > Changes since the last release: > https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/maven-3.9.10...maven-3.9.11 > > Dev dist directory (binar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.11

+1 niedz., 13 lip 2025, 15:45 użytkownik Jorge Solorzano napisał: > +1 (nb) > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.11

+1 (nb) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.11

+1 (nb) On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 10:07 PM Matthias Bünger wrote: > +1 (nb) > > Am 12.07.2025 um 20:58 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 14 issues: > > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=milestone%3A3.9.11 > > > > Changes since the last release: > > https://github.com/ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.11

+1 (nb) Am 12.07.2025 um 20:58 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: Hi, We solved 14 issues: https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=milestone%3A3.9.11 Changes since the last release: https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/maven-3.9.10...maven-3.9.11 Dev dist directory (binaries and sources bandles

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.9.11

Hi, +1 from me. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 12.07.25 20:58, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: Hi, We solved 14 issues: https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=milestone%3A3.9.11 Changes since the last release: https://github.com/apache/maven/compare/maven-3.9.10...maven-3.9.11 Dev dist di

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 3.6.1

Hi, +1 from me. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 12.07.25 19:29, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: Hi, We solved 11 issues: https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/issues?q=milestone%3A3.6.1 Changes since the last release: https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/compare/enforcer-3.6.0...enforce

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 3.6.1

+1 sob., 12 lip 2025, 20:53 użytkownik Matthias Bünger napisał: > +1 (nb) > > Am 12.07.2025 um 19:29 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: > > Hi, > > > > We solved 11 issues: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/issues?q=milestone%3A3.6.1 > > > > Changes since the last release: > > > https://git

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 3.6.1

+1 (nb) Am 12.07.2025 um 19:29 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: Hi, We solved 11 issues: https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/issues?q=milestone%3A3.6.1 Changes since the last release: https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/compare/enforcer-3.6.0...enforcer-3.6.1 Staging repo: https://repos

Re: PR - adding docs to maven resolver ant tasks

I've made some updates and set it to "ready for review" now. Best regards, Per On 7/7/25 23:31, Tamás Cservenák wrote: Sounds good. Make it non-draft once done. Thanks T On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 9:44 PM Per Nyfelt wrote: Hi, I created a draft to a PR for maven resolver ant tasks here: https

Re: Proposal: Display dependency checksums (SHA hashes) in maven-dependency-plugin

And one more thing: On a related note (globally, not TC related directly), in Maven 4 (Resolver 2) we have much greater control over connectors, see https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/issues/1361 And as the issue shows, "signature checking" connector is about to arrive soon(ish). And this a

Re: Proposal: Display dependency checksums (SHA hashes) in maven-dependency-plugin

Howdy, Yes, sadly we (project) are very bad at "advertising" and "properly documenting" things. Sorry about that. Trusted checksums is in fact SPI and one can plug in various sources (while resolver contains some "basic" implementations). This is a very similar setup as with Remote Repository Fi

Re: Proposal: Display dependency checksums (SHA hashes) in maven-dependency-plugin

On 7/11/25 7:26 AM, Calum Harrison wrote: "Trusted Checksums" is good to know about -- I had missed that. It's very easy to miss! I came across it accidentally myself rather recently. I was participating in this issue: [MNG-6026] Extend the Project Object Model (POM) with trust information

Re: Proposal: Display dependency checksums (SHA hashes) in maven-dependency-plugin

Hi, You are all fundamentally correct: Just printing the checksums is of course insufficient. For large projects, it would just be noise. The aim would be for the hashes to be consumed by downstream systems. `maven-dependency-plugin` seemed to me one of the more natural places to provide this fun

Re: Proposal: Display dependency checksums (SHA hashes) in maven-dependency-plugin

Howdy, The proposal is kinda wrong, for starters as dependency:tree collects dependencies but does not resolve them. Without resolution, the artifacts in question may not be even present on disk, so what gives? But, as a counter "proposal", I toyed with the Toolbox project, which already was able

Re: Proposal: Display dependency checksums (SHA hashes) in maven-dependency-plugin

Hi, There is a "Trusted Checksums" https://maven.apache.org/resolver/expected-checksums.html We can store / record checksums in the project file and use it next time. Here is a demo project with "Trusted Checksums" https://github.com/cstamas/tc-demo On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 00:55, Elliotte Rus

Re: Proposal: Display dependency checksums (SHA hashes) in maven-dependency-plugin

I tend to agree that simply displaying a checksum is most likely going to be ignored. And even if it is looked at .. how would you know from looking at the checksum if it is the one of the original deployed artifact in Maven Central or a rebuilt one or a patched one. The checksum alone will do

Re: Proposal: Display dependency checksums (SHA hashes) in maven-dependency-plugin

Personal opinion only: displaying checksums, even optionally, is unlikely to be helpful. No one pays attention to these or verifies them. Recently I actually went to the trouble of verifying the checksums for a major Apache project and discovered the KEYS file was borked. No one had noticed for yea

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.11 release

+1 :) On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:53 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > I think not, Sergey? > > T > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:41 PM Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > > I'm confused, does the -1 still stand? > > > > Gary > > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2025, 05:28 Sergey Chernov > wrote: > > > > > I tested 3.9.10 and

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.11 release

I think not, Sergey? T On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:41 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > > I'm confused, does the -1 still stand? > > Gary > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2025, 05:28 Sergey Chernov wrote: > > > I tested 3.9.10 and thought that the problem was still relevant (my > > mistake). > > Decided to reinsure to p

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.11 release

I'm confused, does the -1 still stand? Gary On Wed, Jul 9, 2025, 05:28 Sergey Chernov wrote: > I tested 3.9.10 and thought that the problem was still relevant (my > mistake). > Decided to reinsure to prevent releasing this. > > binaries staged by Slawek should not be affected > > On Wed, Jul 9,

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.11 release

Nice, and many thanks for being vigilant here! Thanks T On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:28 PM Sergey Chernov wrote: > > I tested 3.9.10 and thought that the problem was still relevant (my > mistake). > Decided to reinsure to prevent releasing this. > > binaries staged by Slawek should not be affected

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.11 release

I tested 3.9.10 and thought that the problem was still relevant (my mistake). Decided to reinsure to prevent releasing this. binaries staged by Slawek should not be affected On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:22 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Cool, good to hear this and many thanks! > > But now I am a bit c

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.11 release

Cool, good to hear this and many thanks! But now I am a bit confused: what did you test then? Or you say that binaries staged by Slawek are affected? Thanks T On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:19 PM Sergey Chernov wrote: > > Just checked the latest master of Maven4 (66e96ffcbeec9), the problem is > not

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.11 release

Just checked the latest master of Maven4 (66e96ffcbeec9), the problem is not reproducible here. And it's not reproducible on latest maven-3.9.x (a8a44dc0ad3b) anymore. I bisected the fixing commit, it's this one https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/2489 by Alan Zimmer. Great news, it's okay now and

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.11 release

Wow, thanks Sergey for testing! Can you please check Maven master as well (with your project, as there is no reproducer yet)? As if Maven 4/master behaves the same, I propose to rollback https://github.com/apache/maven/issues/10553 fully (from Maven 3 and 4). But if Maven 4 behaves, it would mea

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.11 release

I forgot to mention, that if this commit is reverted https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/45201347c4 the problem is gone. So it’s obviously related. > On 9 Jul 2025, at 12:05, Sergey Chernov wrote: > > https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/45201347c4

Re: [HEADS UP] Maven 3.9.11 release

-1 (nb) I’ve discovered an issue with module subset running (when we specify “-pl” with multiple modules) and running CLI style “surefire:test” instead of phase style). So my command looks like “mvn surefire:test -pl :module1,:module2,:module3,:module4" The problem appears since this commit h

Re: PR - adding docs to maven resolver ant tasks

On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 7:44 PM Per Nyfelt wrote: > As this took several weeks, i realize that the content is a bit > different depending on which day (or night) I wrote what - i will fix > this. While doing that, do we have some "style" guideline for what good > javadoc should be like that I can

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 6:46 AM Hervé Boutemy wrote: > In the past, the complaint was that there was no "standard" REST API to > publish (ignoring that REST did not exist when Maven was growing). REST certainly did exist when Maven was growing. REST predates Maven significantly. It is the purpose

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

and have different requirements you need > to implement > > Hence, the thing I'd recommend from maveniverse is Njord: > https://maveniverse.eu/docs/njord/ > > That basically (re) implements what Nx2 had, but locally and adds > publishing support as well. > This extens

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

FTR this one https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/375 I had such size issue with Jetty release when migrating to new central portal but finally used jdk22 and sorry forgot to release the javadoc plugin On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 10:56 am, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Oh > Javadoc jars size is

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

Oh Javadoc jars size issue because using last jdk? I can release javadoc plugin next week when back holidays On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 1:38 am, Mateusz Gajewski < mateusz.gajew...@starburstdata.com> wrote: > I’d like to migrate to sonatype central but it introduced new set of > limitations that made

Re: PR - adding docs to maven resolver ant tasks

Sounds good. Make it non-draft once done. Thanks T On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 9:44 PM Per Nyfelt wrote: > > Hi, > > I created a draft to a PR for maven resolver ant tasks here: > https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver-ant-tasks/pull/62 > > It does not contain any functional changes, just documenta

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

We have a plugin-based system so these are sources + tests + javadocs + plugins + server assembly (alone it's 1 GB) On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 4:47 PM Andres Almiray wrote: > I'm sorry, what? A single release encompassing 5.9Gb ?!?! > > This is not good, not good at all. Please tell you're uploading

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

ain - or meddle with your build and have different requirements you need to implement Hence, the thing I'd recommend from maveniverse is Njord: https://maveniverse.eu/docs/njord/ That basically (re) implements what Nx2 had, but locally and adds publishing support as well. This extension was done to ful

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

I'm sorry, what? A single release encompassing 5.9Gb ?!?! This is not good, not good at all. Please tell you're uploading a full product (ZIPs, and what not) other than just JARs and POMs. If you do, _please_ stop. Do Not use Maven Central as a file storage just because it's convenient to upload v

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

I’d like to migrate to sonatype central but it introduced new set of limitations that made our project (Trino) unreleasable (2 gb upload limit where our project is 5.9 Gb) :) I have no idea what was wrong with the previous approach (create staging repo, upload multiple files, close repo, promote)

Re: Communicate around OSSRH end of life, maven-deploy-plugin and central-publishing-maven-plugin ?

On 2025/07/06 12:36:02 Jon Harper wrote: > Hi everyone, > I think it would be very beneficial for the community that the maven > dev team communicates on the current events of the sunset of OSSRH. > Otherwise, I think there is a big risk of uncertainty and division in > the community. > > Quoting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven GPG Plugin version 3.2.8

Thanks. There's at least one that's snuck in since then that seems genuinely unused: https://github.com/apache/maven-gpg-plugin/pull/288 The others might indicate bugs in the dependency analyzer. On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 4:00 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > Elliotte please see > https://issues.ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 3.6.0

+1 niedz., 29 cze 2025, 18:52 użytkownik Tamás Cservenák napisał: > +1 > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, 12:49 Slawomir Jaranowski > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 52 issues: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A3.6.0 > > > > Changes since the last r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 3.6.0

+1 On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, 12:49 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 52 issues: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A3.6.0 > > Changes since the last release: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/compare/enforcer-3.5.0...enforcer-3.6.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 3.6.0

Hi, +1 (nb) Matthias Am 28.06.2025 um 12:48 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski: Hi, We solved 52 issues: https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A3.6.0 Changes since the last release: https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/compare/enforcer-3.5.0...enforcer-3.6.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven GPG Plugin version 3.2.8

Elliotte please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MGPG-111 On Sun, Jun 29, 2025, 14:09 Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > dependencies look like they could use improvement: > > [WARNING] Used undeclared dependencies found: > [WARNING] > com.kohlschutter.junixsocket:junixsocket-common:jar:2.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven GPG Plugin version 3.2.8

Hi, +1 from me. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 28.06.25 11:00, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: Hi, We solved 9 issues: https://github.com/apache/maven-gpg-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A3.2.8 Changes since the last release: https://github.com/apache/maven-gpg-plugin/compare/maven-g

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 2.0.10

Hi, +1 from me. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 26.06.25 21:04, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: Howdy, This Resolver 2.0.10 release is a release with some bug fixes and improvements as well. Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while Maven 3.x remains at Resolver 1.x lineage. The two major ve

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 3.6.0

Hi, +1 from me. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 28.06.25 12:48, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: Hi, We solved 52 issues: https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A3.6.0 Changes since the last release: https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/compare/enforcer-3

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.24

Hi, +1 from me. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 26.06.25 21:20, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: Howdy, This Resolver 1.9.24 release is a release with some bug fixes and improvements as well. Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while Maven 3.x remains at Resolver 1.x lineage. The two major ve

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven GPG Plugin version 3.2.8

dependencies look like they could use improvement: [WARNING] Used undeclared dependencies found: [WARNING]com.kohlschutter.junixsocket:junixsocket-common:jar:2.10.1:compile [WARNING] Unused declared dependencies found: [WARNING]org.bouncycastle:bcutil-jdk18on:jar:1.81:compile [WARNING]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven GPG Plugin version 3.2.8

+1 sob., 28 cze 2025, 11:18 użytkownik Tamás Cservenák napisał: > +1 > > On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, 11:03 Slawomir Jaranowski > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 9 issues: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-gpg-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A3.2.8 > > > > Changes since the last re

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 2.0.10

+1 sob., 28 cze 2025, 11:18 użytkownik Tamás Cservenák napisał: > +1 > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025, 21:04 Slawomir Jaranowski > wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > > This Resolver 2.0.10 release is a release with some bug fixes and > > improvements as well. > > > > Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven GPG Plugin version 3.2.8

+1 On Sat, Jun 28, 2025, 11:03 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 9 issues: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-gpg-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A3.2.8 > > Changes since the last release: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-gpg-plugin/compare/maven-gpg-plugin-3.2.7...mave

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 2.0.10

+1 On Thu, Jun 26, 2025, 21:04 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Howdy, > > This Resolver 2.0.10 release is a release with some bug fixes and > improvements as well. > > Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while Maven 3.x remains at > Resolver 1.x lineage. The two major versions, as far as client c

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.24

+1 On Thu, Jun 26, 2025, 21:22 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Howdy, > > This Resolver 1.9.24 release is a release with some bug fixes and > improvements as well. > > Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while Maven 3.x remains at > Resolver 1.x lineage. The two major versions, as far as client c

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.24

+1 pt., 27 cze 2025, 17:42 użytkownik Michael Osipov napisał: > +1 > > On 2025/06/26 19:20:17 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > This Resolver 1.9.24 release is a release with some bug fixes and > > improvements as well. > > > > Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while Maven 3.x re

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 1.9.24

+1 On 2025/06/26 19:20:17 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Howdy, > > This Resolver 1.9.24 release is a release with some bug fixes and > improvements as well. > > Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while Maven 3.x remains at > Resolver 1.x lineage. The two major versions, as far as client code >

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resolver 2.0.10

+1 On 2025/06/26 19:04:03 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Howdy, > > This Resolver 2.0.10 release is a release with some bug fixes and > improvements as well. > > Maven 4.x is picking up Resolver 2.x, while Maven 3.x remains at > Resolver 1.x lineage. The two major versions, as far as client code >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Invoker Plugin version 3.9.1

+1 Olivier Lamy 于2025年6月25日 周三15:12写道： > +1 > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 07:50, Slawomir Jaranowski > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 21 issues: > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-invoker-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A%223.9.1%22 > > > > Changes since the last release: > > > ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

@Sergey Chernov well if you really want to refine the performance for now, you can try my branch of maven resolver(which is still being reviewed) at https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/1492 1. build&install the maven-resolver 2. change dependency version in maven main repo of it 3. bui

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Invoker Plugin version 3.9.1

+1 On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 07:50, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > Hi, > > We solved 21 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven-invoker-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A%223.9.1%22 > > Changes since the last release: > https://github.com/apache/maven-invoker-plugin/compare/maven-invoker-p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Invoker Plugin version 3.9.1

+1 wt., 24 cze 2025, 23:56 użytkownik Tamás Cservenák napisał: > +1 > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025, 23:50 Slawomir Jaranowski > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 21 issues: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-invoker-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A%223.9.1%22 > > > > Changes since t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 Le mer. 18 juin 2025 à 16:27, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > > Hi, > > We solved the following issues: > > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A4.0.0-rc-4 > > There are still a couple of issues left in GitHub: > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Invoker Plugin version 3.9.1

+1 On Mon, Jun 23, 2025, 23:50 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 21 issues: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-invoker-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A%223.9.1%22 > > Changes since the last release: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-invoker-plugin/compare/maven-invoker-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Invoker Plugin version 3.9.1

+1 On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 23:50, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > Hi, > > We solved 21 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven-invoker-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A%223.9.1%22 > > Changes since the last release: > https://github.com/apache/maven-invoker-plugin/compare/maven-invoker-p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven PMD Plugin version 3.27.0

+1 Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 21 on *nix Regards, Hervé Le samedi 21 juin 2025, 20:59:54 CEST Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 41 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven-pmd-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone% > 3A%223.27.0%22 > > Changes sinc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven PMD Plugin version 3.27.0

+1 On 2025/06/21 18:59:54 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 41 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven-pmd-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A%223.27.0%22 > > Changes since the last release: > https://github.com/apache/maven-pmd-plugin/compare/maven-pmd-plugin-3.26.0...mave

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven PMD Plugin version 3.27.0

+1 niedz., 22 cze 2025, 14:03 użytkownik Elliotte Rusty Harold < elh...@ibiblio.org> napisał: > +1 > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 7:00 PM Slawomir Jaranowski > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 41 issues: > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-pmd-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A%223.27

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven PMD Plugin version 3.27.0

+1 On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 7:00 PM Slawomir Jaranowski wrote: > > Hi, > > We solved 41 issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven-pmd-plugin/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A%223.27.0%22 > > Changes since the last release: > https://github.com/apache/maven-pmd-plugin/compare/maven-pmd-plugin-3.2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 (NB) Successfully built a 71 module internal app suite. FYI It's pickiness found needs for two dep versions in a legacy module, which is great find. The fail error message was not helpful ([ERROR] Invalid Collect Request: null -> (snipped dep path)), but with -e the nested exception thankfull

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 Sergey Chernov 于2025年6月20日 周五19:42写道： > +1 > > So far there are performance issues at scale of huge multi-module build, > see https://github.com/apache/maven/issues/2481 > But the build itself looks correct and reproducible (in comparison with > Maven 3.x) > > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:23 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 So far there are performance issues at scale of huge multi-module build, see https://github.com/apache/maven/issues/2481 But the build itself looks correct and reproducible (in comparison with Maven 3.x) On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 11:23 AM Cheng Pan wrote: > Hi Maven community, > > I’m trying

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

Hi Maven community, I’m trying to upgrade Maven 4 for Apache Spark, Maven 4.0.0 RC2 works, but seems it starts to fail since RC3, same for RC4 (purposed by this vote thread). I would appreciate it if anyone can take a look. [1] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/51230 Thanks, Cheng Pan -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 Reproducible Build checked ok: reference build done with JDK 24 on *nix and Maven 4.0.0-rc-3 for future release, using a LTS JDK may be a better idea than JDK 24 And decide if we use a rc Maven for building or latest 3.9.x created a documentation issue https://github.com/apache/maven/issues/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 Arnaud Héritier GitHub/ASF/... : aheritier On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 4:28 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Hi, > > We solved the following issues: > > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A4.0.0-rc-4 > > There are still a couple of issues left in GitHub: > https://gith

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 (nb) Am 18.06.2025 um 16:27 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: Hi, We solved the following issues: https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A4.0.0-rc-4 There are still a couple of issues left in GitHub: https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen Changes si

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

Hi, On 19.06.25 15:08, Sylwester Lachiewicz wrote: +1 I have some warnings on MacOS although it may be my local issue. mvn -v Jun 19, 2025 3:04:50 PM org.jline.nativ.JLineNativeLoader log WARNING: *Failed to load native library:libjlinenative.jnilib. osinfo: Mac/arm64 *(caused by: java.lang.U

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

Sylwester, you need to "un-quarantine" the download, plus, move it out of Downloads before running (as macos considers Downloads and below "daaangerous"). T On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 3:08 PM Sylwester Lachiewicz wrote: > > +1 > > I have some warnings on MacOS although it may be my local issue. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 I have some warnings on MacOS although it may be my local issue. mvn -v Jun 19, 2025 3:04:50 PM org.jline.nativ.JLineNativeLoader log WARNING: *Failed to load native library:libjlinenative.jnilib. osinfo: Mac/arm64 *(caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /Users/xxx/Downloads/apache-maven-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 FTR, the "Changes since the last release" commits surprised me at first, but they are like it, as plugin-testing was merged into master w/ history, so those commits from 2008 are from plugin-testing history, that were not present in rc-3. T On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 4:28 PM Guillaume Nodet wro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 at 16:28, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > Hi, > > We solved the following issues: > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=is%3Aclosed%20milestone%3A4.0.0-rc-4 > > There are still a couple of issues left in GitHub: > https://github.com/apache/maven/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aope

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 4.0.0-rc-4

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | .NET Blog | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book <

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >