Re: RFC: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-681

2014-02-17 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Baptiste, > Hi, IIUC, you're talking about the injection difference that may be introduced between an absent and empty tag. Yes you hit the nail on the head... If so, then by the way, the current situation is even worse than that : putting "*"* or "* "* results by default in the same th

Re: RFC: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-681

2014-02-17 Thread Baptiste Mathus
Hi, IIUC, you're talking about the injection difference that may be introduced between an absent and empty tag. If so, then by the way, the current situation is even worse than that : putting "*"* or "* "* results by default in the same thing: considered unspecified, and so null (or default-value

RFC: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-681

2014-02-17 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, I have taken a deeper look into the above issue... In short: If finalName is defined in configuration the name should be left empty...But here the problem is that the injection mechanism says ok the finalName is empty so we use the default value... From my point of view it looks l