opers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brett Porter
Subject: RE: xdoc plugin change proposal
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think I'm done with the current version, if you want to release it -
Please wait just a little... I found a couple of bugs and already patched my
loc
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 10:47, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 1:46 AM:
>
> > On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 19:35, Brett Porter wrote:
> >> Cool, that fits within our current technique.
> >>
> >> Who wants to be project lead for Xdoc and responsible for managing
> >> i
Jason van Zyl wrote on Tuesday, April 13, 2004 1:46 AM:
> On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 19:35, Brett Porter wrote:
>> Cool, that fits within our current technique.
>>
>> Who wants to be project lead for Xdoc and responsible for managing
>> its releases?
>
> That would be me :-)
>
> I'll eventually merg
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I think I'm done with the current version, if you want to release it -
Please wait just a little... I found a couple of bugs and already patched my local
version, I will submit a jira report with the patches soon.
the bugs are related to:
- doc:j
Tuesday, 13 April 2004 9:46 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: xdoc plugin change proposal
>
>
> On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 19:35, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Cool, that fits within our current technique.
> >
> > Who wants to be project lead for Xdoc and responsi
rsion.
> - Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 13 April 2004 9:34 AM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: xdoc plugin change proposal
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 19
gt; Subject: RE: xdoc plugin change proposal
>
>
> On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 19:26, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Guys, I'd prefer to leave xdoc as is for maven 1.0. As we
> saw from the
> > last wholesale changes, it can become quite unusable quite
> easily. We
> >
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 19:26, Brett Porter wrote:
> Guys, I'd prefer to leave xdoc as is for maven 1.0. As we saw from the last
> wholesale changes, it can become quite unusable quite easily. We can release
> an xdoc-plugin-2.0 after 1.0.
Agreed, I'm not suggesting they be incorporated into the 1.0
n 1.0 if it has any problems.
Cheers,
Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 April 2004 4:58 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: xdoc plugin change proposal
>
>
> On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 13:59, Vin
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 13:59, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Note that the validate link feature is not the feature I'm proposing to
> add. This won't be added as it already exists in Maven. The feature I'm
> proposing is the link by id stuff from my previous mail.
>
> As for waiting for feedback, yes su
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 April 2004 16:33
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: xdoc plugin change proposal
>
> On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 02:46, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> > Yes.
> >
> >
On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 02:46, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Yes.
>
> In Cactus land we also use the sitemap to validate all links. However
> this feature is not required in Maven land as we already have the
> linkcheck plugin.
>
Ok, this is something I would prefer that we find a solution for for the
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 April 2004 00:18
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: xdoc plugin change proposal
>
> On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 16:23, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Hi xdoc plugin maintainers,
&g
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 16:23, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi xdoc plugin maintainers,
>
> I'm slowly moving the Cactus project to Maven. There's a feature we have
> in Cactus for xdoc that I'd like to implement in the Maven xdoc plugin.
> It's the notion of sitemap.
>
> It works as follows:
>
> - a s
14 matches
Mail list logo
