Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>Who can do that ?
>I think it will concern only updates and new features on plugins (bugs are not
>significant because m2 plugins were totally rewriten
>from scratch).
>
>
an example of a bug is MPIDEA-39. This probably affects both.
>But actually I don't know which f
>
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> We discussed this briefly before. From looking at that, this
> seems to be the most workable solution:
> - for any new features added in m1 or m2, we add a
> description to the plugin site so that we have a comparitive checklist
+1, I'll try to do it as soon as possible in pl
Sounds reasonable to me. Somebody wants to come up with a template for
the plugin feature list?
Concerning all the great work we've done recently (:)), it shouldn't be
too hard to extract the information from the entries in changes.xml.
Maybe this could be implemented as part of the changes
