Re: results of synchronize

2005-07-01 Thread Jörg Schaible
Carlos Sanchez wrote: > I've moved > /home/projects/maven/repository-staging/to-ibiblio/reports/repoclean > symlink to repoclean.bak and created a new empty dir. Not sure if it's the > right solution but should work. Well, seems to work again. But somebody might call Stacy at picounit ;-) - Jörg

Re: results of synchronize

2005-07-01 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I've moved /home/projects/maven/repository-staging/to-ibiblio/reports/repoclean symlink to repoclean.bak and created a new empty dir. Not sure if it's the right solution but should work. On 7/1/05, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > repoclean seems to have a serious problem ... > > [EM

RE: results of synchronize

2005-07-01 Thread Jörg Schaible
repoclean seems to have a serious problem ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, July 01, 2005 10:02 AM: > Syncing Apache Software Foundation > Syncing Codehaus > Syncing Maven Plugins @ SourceForge > Syncing Mortbay Consulting > Syncing ObjectWeb > Syncing Open Symphony > Syncing OS Java > java

Re: results of synchronize

2005-05-06 Thread Brett Porter
Ok, it's definitely one of the Tomcat JARs, so should be fine. My main concern is that it did not come from the ASF repository. Did anyone drop this into the repo directly? I didn't see a MAVENUPLOAD for it, though I may have just missed it. Cheers, Brett Brett Porter wrote: >Note that it doesn

Re: results of synchronize

2005-05-06 Thread Brett Porter
Note that it doesn't appear to have been picked up from a partner, so someone must have dropped it directly into the Maven 1.x repository... - Brett Brett Porter wrote: >Can someone confirm where this came from and whether we are entitled to >distribute it? > >- Brett > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: results of synchronize

2005-05-06 Thread Brett Porter
Can someone confirm where this came from and whether we are entitled to distribute it? - Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >servletapi/servletapi/ >servletapi/servletapi/2.4.public_draft/ >servletapi/servletapi/2.4.public_draft/servletapi-2.4.public_draft.jar >servletapi/servletapi/2.4.public_draft

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-25 Thread Brett Porter
The warnings weren't particularly pertaining to your artifacts, so it's not something you have to worry about - but thanks for the interest! :) Cheers, Brett Nacho G. Mac Dowell wrote: >> >> >> One of the artifacts filenames in the source repository was not good. At >> the moment we are not corr

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-24 Thread Nacho G. Mac Dowell
One of the artifacts filenames in the source repository was not good. At the moment we are not correcting this, so it continues to warn on every build. It'll be improved over time. What name? Is there anything we (ws.apache.org/jaxme) can do to fix it? best regards, Nacho G. Mac Dowell

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-22 Thread Brett Porter
Nacho G. Mac Dowell wrote: > Could someone please point what the [WARNING] means? One of the artifacts filenames in the source repository was not good. At the moment we are not correcting this, so it continues to warn on every build. It'll be improved over time. - Brett > > Did anything go wron

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-22 Thread Nacho G. Mac Dowell
Could someone please point what the [WARNING] means? Did anything go wrong? Best regards, Nacho G. Mac Dowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Syncing Apache Software Foundation Syncing Codehaus Syncing Maven Plugins @ SourceForge Syncing Mortbay Consulting Syncing Open Symphony Syncing OS Java [INFO] Sour

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
ok, fixed this bug. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Sync already running... exiting >maven 24392 24391 0 00:12 ? 00:00:00 /bin/sh -c >$HOME/repository-tools/synchronize.sh 2>&1 | mail -s 'results of synchronize' >dev@maven.apache.org > >

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-19 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I think we should go with no snapshots. Each project should have it's own repository if people wants to be on the bleeding edge. I'm ok with betas and alphas. Regards On 4/19/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, for now I am excluding distributions from the sync and have > contacted

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
Ok, for now I am excluding distributions from the sync and have contacted ibiblio for help. We may need to make this a policy, since activemq have a 500mb directory... I'll see what they say and we can discuss options such as: - not syncing distributions - not syncing snapshots, or having a smalle

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
write failed on activemq-3.1-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz : No space left on device yeah, that'll do it :) I'll track it down... Carlos Sanchez wrote: >I was today also trying to sync it manually as the jars I've uploaded >haven't get into ibiblio, I have experienced the same problem and also >needed to hit

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-19 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I was today also trying to sync it manually as the jars I've uploaded haven't get into ibiblio, I have experienced the same problem and also needed to hit control-c On 4/19/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Me hitting Ctrl-C :) > > I'm trying to figure out why it is hanging scp'ing th

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
Me hitting Ctrl-C :) I'm trying to figure out why it is hanging scp'ing that - it is rather large, but shouldn't take over an hour... John Casey wrote: > >>activemq/distributions/ > >>activemq/distributions/activemq-3.1-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz > >>rsync error: received SIGUSR1 or SIGINT (code 20) at rsy

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-19 Thread John Casey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>activemq/distributions/ >>activemq/distributions/activemq-3.1-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz >>rsync error: received SIGUSR1 or SIGINT (code 20) at rsync.c(229) >>building file list ... rsync error: received SIGUSR1 or SIGINT (code 20) at >>rsync.c(229) What do

Re: results of synchronize

2005-04-19 Thread Brett Porter
I'm going to send these here for the moment until we can get it to a state of better being able to track errors. - Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Syncing Apache Software Foundation >Syncing Codehaus >Syncing Maven Plugins @ SourceForge >Syncing Mortbay Consulting >Syncing Open Symphony >Syncing