> Vincent discussed this with dIon and me on IRC and we
> supported this change.
That's fine, but it was a reasonably large change, and it seemed like there
were unresolved issues around it reading the mailing list.
Anyway, if everyone is happy, I'm ok with it - I just wanted to make sure
everyo
On Mon, 3 May 2004 09:41:16 +1000, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Vincent,
Thanks for all the work you did on this. I wish I'd been around to get
in on the discussion - I think we still may have to consider how we
handle this inheritence in RC3 if it is going to break builds.
I'm a b
Vincent,
Thanks for all the work you did on this. I wish I'd been around to get in on
the discussion - I think we still may have to consider how we handle this
inheritence in RC3 if it is going to break builds.
I'm a bit concerned that you've jumped in and changed the maven-plugins CVS
without mu
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 19:16, Brett Porter wrote:
> The memory problem is in xdoc (I guess jelly) somewhere.
Which we can remedy by using the new java version of the xdoc.
> - Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 7
The memory problem is in xdoc (I guess jelly) somewhere.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 3 May 2004 7:34 AM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: plugin sites have been rebuilt...
>
>
> FYI, I've just rebuilt all the plug
