It might be clearer to annotate the diagram, rather than have a
separate key table.
On 3 January 2014 14:41, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Just in case it wasn't clear... I'm looking for comments and feedback
>
>
> On 3 January 2014 14:35, Stephen Connolly
> wrote:
>
>> OK, so to start working on new
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Tutorial%3A+Maven+in+60+seconds
Still think that it is overly vague.
It would be easier to understand if the passive voice was eliminated.
Makes it clearer to understand what the developer has to do and what
maven is going to do while processing
Also, in case it is not clear, my preferred style is to tell you
information that is important later without distracting you by that
information
A case in point is the information that
> The list of modules in the reactor is sorted in order to ensure that any
dependencies that will be created by
FYI here is my current plan for content:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/New+Main+Site
On 3 January 2014 16:27, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> I agree with Robert's comment.
> There is a danger that the page will become architecturally elegant and
> will correctly describe all of the p
On 3 January 2014 16:09, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Op Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:46:33 +0100 schreef Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>:
>
>
> On 3 January 2014 15:17, Robert Scholte wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make
>>> somethi
Op Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:46:33 +0100 schreef Stephen Connolly
:
On 3 January 2014 15:17, Robert Scholte wrote:
Hi,
I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make
something
clear for new Maven users.
Instead I'd prefer a linear model.
My first draft did not have the gr
On 3 January 2014 15:17, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make something
> clear for new Maven users.
> Instead I'd prefer a linear model.
>
My first draft did not have the graph at the top... perhaps it would be
better suited at the bot
Hi,
I like the idea of images, however I would avoid a graph to make something
clear for new Maven users.
Instead I'd prefer a linear model.
I think you should split the current model into pieces:
A project model contains:
- dependencies
- a build plan
- other project models ( you can call t
Just in case it wasn't clear... I'm looking for comments and feedback
On 3 January 2014 14:35, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> OK, so to start working on new content I created some pages on the wiki:
>
> The first page is a 60 seconds overview of Maven's build process
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/co
It's not fixed, but reduced in likelihood. Previously, the width of
source boxes was fixed at 955px, I changed that to 100%. As soon as you
resize the window below the width of the page, it drops down under the
nav again.
I think we can close it won't fix, personally :)
- Brett
Lukas Theussl wro
What is it that fixed it? Can we close MPXDOC-101 now?
-Lukas
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Brett,
You solved the problem! Works fine for me on IE (and firefox)
http://maven.apache.org/maven2/getting-started.html
Good work for the new CSS!
Regards,
Vincent
-
2 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: new site
>
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> >I have some comments:
> >
> >* The text font for the main text is too small for me. I think it should
> be
> >of the same size as the menu. See
> >http://www.apache.or
Ah, it was on some elements but I'd removed it forgetting to put it at
the top level.
Will do.
- Brett
Jörg Schaible wrote:
>Brett Porter wrote on Tuesday, October 04, 2005 8:43 PM:
>
>
>
>>here is the proposed new site:
>>http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
>>http://people.apa
Brett Porter wrote on Tuesday, October 04, 2005 8:43 PM:
> here is the proposed new site:
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/
>
> any final objections?
Set white as background color in the CSS. If the browser does not use white
Hi, I was wondering, are the inconsistencies in the "header" of the 2
sites intenden or just human errors? (OBS, they are not BIG errors, you
might consider them more like build warnings :-)
anyway here they come those that I have found..
* The maven apache logo has links to 2 different places
Vincent Massol wrote:
>I have some comments:
>
>* The text font for the main text is too small for me. I think it should be
>of the same size as the menu. See
>http://www.apache.org/~vmassol/maven-site-comment-small-text.jpg
>
>* The table items are in very small font making it very hard to read.
Hi,
I agree with Vincent so +0
Another small comment with xp sp2, 1024*768:
It seems that the first tag is not correctly handle by IE (but
seems good with firefox). See:
http://people.apache.org/~vsiveton/newcss/getting-started.jpg
Good work! Thanks.
Cheers,
Vincent
2005/10/4, Vincent Massol
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Jason van Zyl wrote:
+1 (no objections) - much better!
> On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 04:42 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> > here is the proposed new site:
> > http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
> > http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/
> >
> > any final obj
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 04:42 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> here is the proposed new site:
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/
>
> any final objections?
+1
We can adjust anything later. I agree with Vincent it's a bit of a
strain
Seems like this page is missing the apache logo for some reason:
http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/developers/mojo-api-specification.html
Much better with those tweaks - only thing I'd say is maybe use the
green more for headers etc. in future to stop becoming too gray..
+1
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 4 octobre 2005 20:43
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: new site
>
> here is the proposed new site:
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-sit
>
> here is the proposed new site:
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
You forgot the maven logo on the right of the header in the m2 site.
> http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/
+1
Arnaud
-
It's ok for me
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
here is the proposed new site:
http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven2-stage-site/
http://people.apache.org/~brett/maven-stage-site/
any final objections?
- Brett
-
To unsubscrib
For m1 you can take a look at :
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/xdoc/src/plugin-resources/css/maven-base.css?view=markup
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/xdoc/src/plugin-resources/css/maven-theme.css?view=markup
Arnaud
On 8/3/05, Henning
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 10:02 +0200, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> On 8/2/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Question: Is there documentation somewhere how you can influence the
> > > site build with your own style sheet? And which CSS tags must be
> > > defined for the site to build?
>
I've had a bit more of a think about it, and I like 31 - the colour in
the opening paragraph is a bit strong for me in the others.
I'd like to look at alternatives for the Maven logo itself, but this is
better than the current one ;)
I wonder if we want (or maybe are obliged) to put the current A
On 8/2/05, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Question: Is there documentation somewhere how you can influence the
> > site build with your own style sheet? And which CSS tags must be
> > defined for the site to build?
> The properties you can set are described at
> http://maven.apache.o
Vincent Massol wrote:
If I had to choose between the 3 I'd say 31. I find 32 and 33 too "heavy" in
colors and I prefer simplicity.
Same for me. 31 or even lighter than that.
R.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 2 août 2005 17:37
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: New Site CSS
>
> Howdy,
>
> Some folks have designed some new looks for the Maven site and just
> wanted to see what other folks thought. Was hopin
Hi Jason,
I found the design very good but what about the size to download ?
Personnally I prefer the 31.
Arnaud
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mardi 2 août 2005 17:37
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : New Site CSS
>
The properties you can set are described at
http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/xdoc/properties.html
On 8/2/05, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Howdy,
>
> >Some folks have designed some new looks for the Maven site and j
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Howdy,
>Some folks have designed some new looks for the Maven site and just
>wanted to see what other folks thought. Was hoping we could decide on
>one of the following choices here:
>http://codehaus.org/~jvanzyl/mavensites/
Question: Is there document
d [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:38 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: RE : New site layout
>
>
> Is it me, or is there no content behind the nav links?
>
I think there's no content because it is the same thing for me :-)
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mercredi 26 mai 2004 16:38
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : Re: RE : New site layout
>
>
> Is it me,
html
>
> Actually I don't see it in the current menu nor in your site.
>
> Arnaud.
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoyé : mercredi 26 mai 2004 08:57
> > À : 'Maven Developers List'
nvoyé : mercredi 26 mai 2004 08:57
> À : 'Maven Developers List'
> Objet : RE: New site layout
>
>
> Looks good to me content-wise. I have no issue with the look
> either :-)
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Br
Looks good to me content-wise. I have no issue with the look either :-)
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 May 2004 07:35
> To: Maven Developers List ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Subject: New site layout
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have started
> - The bullet points are a little obtrusive and clash with the
> menu separators, e.g. IDE Integration and Propoganda
Just the same as normal in xdoc though?
> - Run a spell check for 'Propaganda'
Thanks.
>
> Did you want feedback about the content/structure or just layout etc?
Definitely t
- The bullet points are a little obtrusive and clash with the menu
separators, e.g. IDE Integration and Propoganda
- Run a spell check for 'Propaganda'
Did you want feedback about the content/structure or just layout etc?
On Wed, 26 May 2004 15:34:35 +1000, Brett Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
39 matches
Mail list logo
