On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 2:17 PM Konrad Windszus wrote:
>
> Hi,
> The error message is introduced with
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSOURCES-121 in 3.3.0:
> If you have two goals both attaching an artifact with the same classifier and
> extension to the current project they will overwr
> PS: There is also a typo in the error message: maven-source-plugn ->
> maven-source-plugin
>
Reported and fixed already in master:
https://github.com/apache/maven-source-plugin/commit/1edeea47f80bc5c5903e88c1adbff56501248a8b
Hi,
The error message is introduced with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSOURCES-121 in 3.3.0:
If you have two goals both attaching an artifact with the same classifier and
extension to the current project they will overwrite each other.
Please check which classifiers are used for both goa
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:42 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
>
> Am 2023-08-15 um 14:57 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In Commons Parent [1], we want to configure child POMs to build both
> > source and test sources, so we say (among other things):
> >
> >
> > maven-source-pl
Am 2023-08-15 um 14:57 schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All,
In Commons Parent [1], we want to configure child POMs to build both
source and test sources, so we say (among other things):
maven-source-plugin
create-source-jar
Letting Maven sleep for 2 seconds between the 2 executions doesn't help.
There's something else going wrong.
Any Linux user that can solve this?
thanks,
Robert
On 27-7-2020 09:32:10, Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
jdk can be good point,
pass build use: Java version: 1.8.0_241, vendor: Oracle Corporat
jdk can be good point,
pass build use: Java version: 1.8.0_241, vendor: Oracle Corporation,
runtime: /usr/local/asfpackages/java/jdk1.8.0_241/jre
failed has: Java version: 1.8.0_252, vendor: Oracle Corporation,
runtime: /usr/local/asfpackages/java/openjdk-8u252-b09/jre
on mac os with: Java
My bad, it is indeed the Ubuntu that is failing.
It might be caused be JDK-8177809[1]
IIRC when using Path instead of File you won't have this issue.
Robert
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177809
On 27-7-2020 07:31:41, Christian Stein wrote:
Hi,
Why do you think it's the Windows
Hi,
Why do you think it's the Windows node, Robert?
For me, it [1] says 5 times: linux-jdk8-m3.6.x_build
The file separator chars displayed in the log file also points to a Linux
node:
>
> [INFO] The post-build script did not succeed. assert buildLog.text =~
> /(?i) Archive .*${sourcesJarFileN
Hi Tibor,
On 11/28/15 9:36 PM, Tibor Digana wrote:
..but I don't understand why you want to have the descriptor in sources jar?
So we could discuss why a site archive needs a descriptor? Why does a
javadoc archive should have a descriptor
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-431).
Am 2015-11-28 um 23:35 schrieb Tibor Digana:
For me the descriptor was always useless. Do you Karl, Michael mean that
this cofiguration does not work?
http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/index.html#class_archive>>
It does not help because it is disabled (hardcoded) in Javadoc Plugin:
For me the descriptor was always useless. Do you Karl, Michael mean that
this cofiguration does not work?
http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-archiver/index.html#class_archive>>
You did not mention Jira # in maven-source-plugin.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Michael Osipov
wrote:
> Am 20
Am 2015-11-28 um 21:36 schrieb Tibor Digana:
..but I don't understand why you want to have the descriptor in sources jar?
Is the plugin buggy or something or it is just arbitrary some reason found
for a release?
Please see MJAVADOC-431 and the PR but I consider them as special cases
and not wo
..but I don't understand why you want to have the descriptor in sources jar?
Is the plugin buggy or something or it is just arbitrary some reason found
for a release?
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at the moment the maven-source-plugin creates archives (sou
Am 2015-11-28 um 19:56 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi Michael,
On 11/28/15 7:43 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2015-11-28 um 19:14 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
at the moment the maven-source-plugin creates archives (source archives)
which do not contain a maven descriptor ...
/META-INF/ma
Hi Michael,
On 11/28/15 7:43 PM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2015-11-28 um 19:14 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
at the moment the maven-source-plugin creates archives (source archives)
which do not contain a maven descriptor ...
/META-INF/maven//../pom.xml
/META-INF/maven//../pom.prope
Am 2015-11-28 um 19:14 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
at the moment the maven-source-plugin creates archives (source archives)
which do not contain a maven descriptor ...
/META-INF/maven//../pom.xml
/META-INF/maven//../pom.properties
I would like to change the default behaviour to pr
I have performed the staging release and will cast for the vote right now.
Stéphane
On 4/20/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Niall: ping! :-)
On 4/13/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ping!
>
> Niall
>
> On 4/3/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Quoting Niall: ping! :-)
On 4/13/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ping!
Niall
On 4/3/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 3 Apr 07, at 1:39 PM 3 Apr 07, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > now that Maria has applied MSOURCES-14, can this release proceed?
> >
>
ping!
Niall
On 4/3/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3 Apr 07, at 1:39 PM 3 Apr 07, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> now that Maria has applied MSOURCES-14, can this release proceed?
>
I'll check it with the embedder and a few other projects before I
give it a thumbs up.
jason
On 3 Apr 07, at 1:39 PM 3 Apr 07, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
now that Maria has applied MSOURCES-14, can this release proceed?
I'll check it with the embedder and a few other projects before I
give it a thumbs up.
jason.
Thanks,
Jochen
--
My cats know that I am a loser who goes out
Hi,
now that Maria has applied MSOURCES-14, can this release proceed?
Thanks,
Jochen
--
My cats know that I am a loser who goes out for hunting every day
without ever returning as much as a single mouse. Fortunately, I've
got a wife who's a real champ: She leaves the house and returns within
Hi Ben,
Generally for being a committer you need to be around for a while,
provide patches via Jira etc and then someone will nominate you.
For your specific question, it may be as simple as refactoring the goal
so that a new one can be created that doesn't have @execute and then
calls into the co
create an issue in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSOURCES and attach
a patch with your proposed solution.
The more patches/docs/... you contribute, the more chances to be
nominated as committer
On 3/22/07, Ben Tatham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I am new to this list, but I thought I wou
On 2/11/07, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 2/11/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All the issue tickets for the maven sources plugin are resolved:
>
>http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSOURCES
>
> Is there likely to be a 2.0.3 release soon?
>
Yes, I'll handle
Hi,
On 2/11/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All the issue tickets for the maven sources plugin are resolved:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSOURCES
Is there likely to be a 2.0.3 release soon?
Yes, I'll handle this.
Cheers,
Stéphane
thx
Niall
I've added a comment to the issue about your patch
to keep backwards comaptibility you can't remove non private methods,
so you need to refactor your patch to keep old methods while adding
the new ones you need, avoiding code duplication
On 7/10/06, m k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The maven-sour
Could someone take a look at this?
Thanks,
Brett
On 11/07/2006 7:16 AM, m k wrote:
The maven-source-plugin is ignoring the includes/excludes sections of
resources. This issue was logged (
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSOURCES-6). I proposed a patch for this
issue and was wondering if the d
Thanks!
On 2/19/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> The project is created : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPSOURCE
> You are the project lead (I used your account sni - tell me if you
> use another one).
>
> For the main plugins site, you can redeploy it. When
Hi Stephan,
The project is created : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPSOURCE
You are the project lead (I used your account sni - tell me if you
use another one).
For the main plugins site, you can redeploy it. When you deploy the
site of one plugin, maven ask you if you want to deploy the
Release has been made and web site is deployed:
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/plugins/source/
Before I announce the release to the community, could anyone please
create a Jira project on codehaus for the source plugin? Also, I never
redeployed the main plugins site so if anyone could
Vote result
5 Bindings: (John, Jason, Emmanuel, Arnaud, Lukas)
3 Non Binding: (Nicolas, Fabrizio, Stephane)
The plugin will be moved to the core plugins and release 1.0 is on its way.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On 2/14/06, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to move the mav
+1
-Lukas
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
Hi,
I would like to move the maven source plugin from the sandbox to the
core plugins. I just added a couple of tests. In the same time, we can
release a 1.0
WDYT?
Thanks,
Stéphane
--
.::You're welcome ::.
+1
fabrizio
On 2/14/06, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to move the maven source plugin from the sandbox to the
> core plugins. I just added a couple of tests. In the same time, we can
> release a 1.0
-
+1
Be careful when you'll do the release to use maven 1.1 to have the
site correctly generated and the POM rewrote.
Arnaud
On 2/14/06, Stephane Nicoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to move the maven source plugin from the sandbox to the
> core plugins. I just added a couple o
No problemo. That's what I expected.
Stephane Nicoll a écrit :
Nicolas,
That's really interesting thanks! Is it ok for you if I add this
script in the source plugin documentation on the web site?
Thanks,
Stéphane
On 2/15/06, Nicolas De Loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to add this :
Nicolas,
That's really interesting thanks! Is it ok for you if I add this
script in the source plugin documentation on the web site?
Thanks,
Stéphane
On 2/15/06, Nicolas De Loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just to add this :
>
> I've used this simple ant script to convert an "old style" sourc
Just to add this :
I've used this simple ant script to convert an "old style" source
repository to new java-sources :
to="\1/java-sources/\2-sources.jar"/>
For "old style" source I mean the
"/src/-version.zip" that was used by the eclipse
plugin.
M
+1
I'm using SNAPSHOT version and it's great !
Jason van Zyl a écrit :
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
Hi,
I would like to move the maven source plugin from the sandbox to the
core plugins. I just added a couple of tests. In the same time, we can
release a 1.0
WDYT?
+1
Thanks,
Stéphane
--
.::Y
+1
Emmanuel
Stephane Nicoll a écrit :
Hi,
I would like to move the maven source plugin from the sandbox to the
core plugins. I just added a couple of tests. In the same time, we can
release a 1.0
WDYT?
Thanks,
Stéphane
--
.::You're welcome ::.
---
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
Hi,
I would like to move the maven source plugin from the sandbox to the
core plugins. I just added a couple of tests. In the same time, we can
release a 1.0
WDYT?
+1
Thanks,
Stéphane
--
.::You're welcome ::.
--
+1
Stephane Nicoll wrote:
Hi,
I would like to move the maven source plugin from the sandbox to the
core plugins. I just added a couple of tests. In the same time, we can
release a 1.0
WDYT?
Thanks,
Stéphane
--
.::You're welcome ::.
42 matches
Mail list logo
