On 1 Sep 06, at 10:17 AM 1 Sep 06, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
I do not understand where you see the problem. If all plugins that
support switching off an uptodate check honour the same property
(which of course they wouldn't do now, but AFAIK no plugins have
implemented that yet, so it is still po
On 9/1/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We talked about it on the list and there was well longer then 72
hours this time. The prefix is for command line use and I asked if
the new standard could be used and folks agreed.
Jason, I understand completely, that it's my fault to miss th
On 1 Sep 06, at 4:26 AM 1 Sep 06, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that the jar plugin uses the property $
{jar.forceCreation} as default of the new parameter
"forceCreation". I find this choice most unfortunate.
We talked about it on the list and there was well longer then 72
-
From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 06:43
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: maven-jar-plugin 2.1: jar.forceCreation
Brett Porter wrote:
> Or perhaps a well known property instead/in the interim:
>
>
>
The latter point
Brett Porter wrote:
Or perhaps a well known property instead/in the interim:
The latter point is what I am asking for. In the case of the jar plugin,
the property is jar.forceCreation, which I find unfortunate.
Again, any chance to get this changed? I'd volunteer to create a version
2
Or perhaps a well known property instead/in the interim:
Just a thought.
On 01/09/2006, at 6:50 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
IMO, if something is to be general, it should be considered for
the POM (like finalName).
I must admit, that I do not understand what y
Brett Porter wrote:
IMO, if something is to be general, it should be considered for the POM
(like finalName).
I must admit, that I do not understand what you have in mind?
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMO, if something is to be general, it should be considered for the
POM (like finalName).
- Brett
On 01/09/2006, at 6:26 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that the jar plugin uses the property $
{jar.forceCreation} as default of the new parameter
"forceCreation". I find this
