Mauro Talevi wrote:
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
No, you missunderstood me, we're not breaking up the repository, its
still all one, just organizing it better for management purposes, the
directory structure is not different virtual machines.
maven.ibibilio.org/apache/
maven.ibibilio.org/codehaus/
s
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
No, you missunderstood me, we're not breaking up the repository, its
still all one, just organizing it better for management purposes, the
directory structure is not different virtual machines.
maven.ibibilio.org/apache/
maven.ibibilio.org/codehaus/
same thing as
www.ibi
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 08:53, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> I think its a great idea to have other organizations who wish to rsync
> use the script. But this should be a decision within those groups, if
> you are a member of that groups and you object, you should take it up
> with that group. The rsy
Mauro Talevi wrote:
Mark,
separating maven repositories by organizations sort of defeates the
point of putting them in a common unique place such as ibiblio.
That is, once could two different url, say
dist.apache.org
dist.codehaus.org
and those can be set on the client side as the maven repos
(
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
With this is mind, Jason, how close are we to having "hierarchical"
organization/group directories? My point is that it would be far easier
for us to control any overlap in projects if the organizations were
isolated into separate directories.
for instance
www.ibiblio.or
, before there
are too many dependent projects?
-Mark
Vincent Massol wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 May 2004 18:10
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: groups syncing to ibiblio
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 11:48, Vincent Massol wrote:
Why shou
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 May 2004 18:10
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: groups syncing to ibiblio
>
> On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 11:48, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> > > Why should aspectwerkz ar
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 11:48, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Why should aspectwerkz artifacts that you place in ibiblio take
> > precedence over what the AspectWerkz developers actually have moved to
> > ibiblio?
>
> Whatever is newer should take precedence.
Not if the difference is between the projec
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 May 2004 17:19
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: groups syncing to ibiblio
>
> On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 10:25, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Can it be configured so that whatever
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 10:25, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Can it be configured so that whatever we put manually in ibiblio don't
> get removed during the next sync with either apache repo or codehaus
> repo?
>
> Say for example that I upload the latest aspectwerkz jar to ibiblio. I
> wouldn't want that
Can it be configured so that whatever we put manually in ibiblio don't
get removed during the next sync with either apache repo or codehaus
repo?
Say for example that I upload the latest aspectwerkz jar to ibiblio. I
wouldn't want that the next rsync from codehaus to ibiblio removes it if
this jar
Not sure why anybody at Apache has to say yes to synchronization of ibibilio
with codehaus repos but you've got my +1
Michal
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 3:41 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: groups syncing to
> Anyone object to having a sync setup for Codehaus --> ibiblio?
>
> I would like to set it up ASAP.
+1 for doing it (not objecting to it) from me.
Coordinate with me if this passes, since dist.codehaus.org is scattered
at the moment.
-bob
--
+1
- Original Message -
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 3:40 PM
Subject: groups syncing to ibiblio
> Howdy,
>
> Currently we have Apache devs depositing artifacts into a directory
> which gets sync'd t
14 matches
Mail list logo
