RE: generated site at maven.apache.org

2003-08-25 Thread dion
t additions to the FAQ or status updates in that case then? > Update the main site or only the new one? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 9:49 AM > > To: 'Maven Developers List

RE: generated site at maven.apache.org

2003-08-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 20:46, Brett Porter wrote: > Where do we put additions to the FAQ or status updates in that case then? > Update the main site or only the new one? The latest news goes on the most recently generated site. So it might become the norm that status document in the released site p

RE: generated site at maven.apache.org

2003-08-25 Thread Vincent Massol
HI Brett, FYI, in Cactus land, I've used option 5). See http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus. You'll see there is a link to the newest stuff in the top right corner of the page. We tried 4) but it didn't work as users expect to see the doc for the released version on the main web site page. We also

Re: generated site at maven.apache.org

2003-08-25 Thread dion
On second thoughts, I'm ok with us having the release as the major site, as long as there is a directory there for HEAD in xdocs. Similar to what's in http://maven.apache.org/reference/developers/releasing-plugins.html -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/pe

Re: generated site at maven.apache.org

2003-08-25 Thread dion
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/08/2003 11:09:55 AM: > On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 18:42, Brett Porter wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to bounce around ideas about how we generate the site at > > maven.apache.org. I fielded a question from a user on the dev list who was > > trying to use

RE: generated site at maven.apache.org

2003-08-25 Thread Brett Porter
Where do we put additions to the FAQ or status updates in that case then? Update the main site or only the new one? > -Original Message- > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 9:49 AM > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subje

Re: generated site at maven.apache.org

2003-08-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 18:42, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to bounce around ideas about how we generate the site at > maven.apache.org. I fielded a question from a user on the dev list who was > trying to use installation instructions for the next release for installing > beta-10. Fair e

RE: generated site at maven.apache.org

2003-08-25 Thread Eric Pugh
I think I like #4. The reason is that once a 1.0 goes out, most users will only be wanting to look at the documentation that applies to that release. By having a prominent link to "whats current" then for people who are using unreleased versions will be able to look at the docs that apply to CVS h