Thanks!
Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Hi Brett,
>
>> Vincent Siveton wrote:
Can we move it to the sandbox, then talk about what information to add
to the POM to make it effective? Perhaps elaboration next to
>> downloadUrl
in distributionManagement.
>>> +1
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> Were you
Hi Brett,
> Vincent Siveton wrote:
> >> Can we move it to the sandbox, then talk about what information to add
> >> to the POM to make it effective? Perhaps elaboration next to
> downloadUrl
> >> in distributionManagement.
> >
> > +1
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Were you going to make this move? I'd like
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Can we move it to the sandbox, then talk about what information to add
to the POM to make it effective? Perhaps elaboration next to downloadUrl
in distributionManagement.
+1
Hi Vincent,
Were you going to make this move? I'd like to do this before nay further
releases
Hi Brett,
> I'm still really unconvinced about this report. It should be working on
> information from the POM, not assembly descriptor - and I'm not sure how
Agree but actually supported formats are in the assembly descriptor.
> much it adds over just typing up a quick APT right now.
Maybe 5 m
I'm still really unconvinced about this report. It should be working on
information from the POM, not assembly descriptor - and I'm not sure how
much it adds over just typing up a quick APT right now.
Can we move it to the sandbox, then talk about what information to add
to the POM to make it
Hi Brett,
(Sorry for the delayed response)
Putting the assembly report in project info reports is the logical way.
To do this change, we need to change the visibility of some
methods/attributes in the AssemblyMojo and AbstractUnpackingMojo
classes (depending the package choose)
Also, projectinfo
Vincent Massol wrote:
What does it do? Same as the download report in the m1 xdoc plugin?
That's my understanding.
It certainly doesn't go into the assembly plugin IMO. However it could
possibly go in the release plugin or in the changes report or in the info
plugin or ...
I agree that it
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: dimanche 23 octobre 2005 03:25
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: download report was: svn commit: r322514
>
> Anyone have some thoughts on splitting this out?
What does it do?
Anyone have some thoughts on splitting this out?
- Brett
Brett Porter wrote:
I may have suggested putting this here in the past, but thinking about it Im
not so sure this is a good idea. Can we have a separate plugin, or put it into
the project info reports, or does it rely on information from
