Good catch, it doesn't :-(
I will change the test to check for both cases...
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 21:24, Brett Porter wrote:
> Does this test still pass if the Cactus plugin is not installed?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Does this test still pass if the Cactus plugin is not installed?
- Brett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
felipeal2004/10/21 23:01:39
Modified:eclipse/src/plugin-test maven.xml project.properties
eclipse/xdocs changes.xml
Added: eclipse/src/plugin-test/src/cactus-test dir.txt
See my other email (which was queued up in my outbox, ARGH!)
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:19 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/eclipse/xdocs changes.xml
&
Why you do this?
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 4:13 PM
Subject: cvs commit: maven-plugins/eclipse/xdocs changes.xml
> epugh 2004/10/19 07:13:04
>
> Modified:eclipse plugin.properties plugin.j
It's fixed.
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 1:12 PM
Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/eclipse/xdocs changes.xml
> Actually, I tried to
8 AM
> To: Maven Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/eclipse/xdocs changes.xml
>
>
> oh yes, sorry.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Maven Developer
oh yes, sorry.
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Pugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/eclipse/xdocs changes.xml
> Should this
Should this be using this syntax:
instead of the invokeStatic:
Not sure if there was a reason to not use this?
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 4:25 PM
> To: [EMA
Thanks! I was just thinking of tackling this one!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 4:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cvs commit: maven-plugins/eclipse/xdocs changes.xml
>
>
> evenisse2004/10/14 08:24
elopers List
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/eclipse/xdocs changes.xml
>
>
> That's a poorly named property if ever I saw one :)
>
> lib is an artifact, not a dependency. I don't see why modifying the
> dependency helps, and its not the right thing to do (mod
That's a poorly named property if ever I saw one :)
lib is an artifact, not a dependency. I don't see why modifying the
dependency helps, and its not the right thing to do (model/runtime
separation - and yes, I notice that the version does this anyway).
lib.urlPath here should give you the
/com
n Developers List
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/eclipse/xdocs changes.xml
>
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> That's not a jar override... try
>
> maven.jar.override=on
> with
> # path override
> maven.jar.commons-jelly-tags-xml=${basedir}/lib/commons-jelly-tags
> -xml-1
Hi Eric,
That's not a jar override... try
maven.jar.override=on
with
# path override
maven.jar.commons-jelly-tags-xml=${basedir}/lib/commons-jelly-tags-xml-1.0.jar
or
# version override
maven.jar.commons-jelly-tags-xml=1.0
for example.
See touchstone or MAVEN-581 for some test cases I've been looki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 25/04/2004 12:26:22 PM:
> brett 2004/04/24 19:26:22
>
> Modified:eclipse project.xml
>eclipse/src/plugin-resources/templates classpath.jelly
>eclipse/xdocs changes.xml
> Log:
> PR: MPECLIPSE-21
> Submitted by: Boris Boe
14 matches
Mail list logo
