f in there", I'm happy with
that because there should always be a better way to do it.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 March 2004 10:27 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: m
Does this mean that Ant 1.6 wasn't the culprit after all?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/03/2004 01:37:20 AM:
> brett 2004/03/02 06:37:20
>
> Modified:checkstyle project.xml
> Log:
> reverted changes, added log4j as it is the only way to get
elopers List
> Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/checkstyle project.xml
>
> AFAIK, the fix I made is correct.
>
> here's the taskedef:
>
>classname="com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.CheckStyleTask">
>
>
Sounds right. Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 December 2003 10:52 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/checkstyle project.xml
>
>
> AFAIK, the fix I made
ld
> way it shouldn't be needed, so it would be good to remove them.
>
> - Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 10 December 2003 1:48 AM
> > To: 'Maven Developers List&#
Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 December 2003 1:48 AM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/checkstyle project.xml
>
>
> dIon,
>
> Is that true? I can't r
dIon,
Is that true? I can't remember but I think I've tried without them and
there was a problem with the checkstyle Ant task definition.
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 December 2003 14:33
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
