RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-11 Thread Maczka Michal
extension is. > > > > Discussion are archived which we had an are probably > locatable looking > > for type/kind/artifacts. Michal, Rafal and myself were among the > > participants that I can recall off hand. > > Sure but we were discussing making the artifact handler > configurable by > end us

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-11 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 May 2004 11:38 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml > > On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 15:13, Vincent Massol wrote: > &

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-11 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 May 2004 11:38 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml > > On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 15:13, Vincent Massol wrote: > &

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-11 Thread Maczka Michal
> > Wagon will be a part of m2 alpha-1 release. Once we have it > ready we can > try > > to backport wagon and higher level componets > > Is there a reason Wagon is tied to m2? > Wagon is not just a better replacement for maven-artifact-plugin. First fundamental difference is that it suppo

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-11 Thread dion_gillard
Maczka Michal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/05/2004 05:29:56 PM: > If you are following the commits logs for maven-components you'll find that > last few days there were quite a lot of them and I am busy working on that. I don't follow the commits for maven-components or maven-core. > Things

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 15:13, Vincent Massol wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 11 May 2004 08:48 > > To: 'Maven Developers List' > > Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs c

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-11 Thread Maczka Michal
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:31 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml > > > Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-11 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 May 2004 08:48 > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml > > Probably? Definitely :) > > I don't think

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-10 Thread Brett Porter
Developers List' > Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml > > > +1 to create an tag which defaults to "jar": > > > [...] > myowntype > myowntypeextension > > > However that's probably for Maven 1.1.

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-10 Thread Vincent Massol
velopers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/05/2004 09:36:35 AM: > > > brett 2004/05/10 16:36:35 > > > > Modified:artifact/src/main/org/apache/maven/artifact/deployer

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-10 Thread dion_gillard
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/05/2004 11:06:38 AM: > > Someone who knows the software can do that, but until they > > do, I'd rather > > fix the things we have. Didn't Ben write Wagon? > > Ben wrote maven-fetch, which I never looked at. I don't know how much of it > influenced W

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-10 Thread Brett Porter
> Someone who knows the software can do that, but until they > do, I'd rather > fix the things we have. Didn't Ben write Wagon? Ben wrote maven-fetch, which I never looked at. I don't know how much of it influenced Wagon, which was primarily written by Michal, based on the artifact code in the c

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-10 Thread dion_gillard
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/05/2004 10:38:15 AM: > What's the point of doing the work twice? Wagon is the Maven refactoring of > the artifact code. We don't need to start another refactoring of the > artifact code. I wasn't planning on refactoring it. > We can't afford the deve

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-10 Thread Brett Porter
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 11 May 2004 10:34 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml > > > Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-10 Thread dion_gillard
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/05/2004 10:01:39 AM: > Long term this will happen in Wagon. Now isn't the time to be making those > sorts of changes :) It's been how long since Wagon was first released? Almost a year I'd guess Promises of Wagon, Classworlds etc are empty for m

RE: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-10 Thread Brett Porter
Long term this will happen in Wagon. Now isn't the time to be making those sorts of changes :) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 11 May 2004 10:03 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: cvs commit:

Re: cvs commit: maven-plugins/artifact/xdocs changes.xml

2004-05-10 Thread dion_gillard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/05/2004 09:36:35 AM: > brett 2004/05/10 16:36:35 > > Modified:artifact/src/main/org/apache/maven/artifact/deployer > DefaultArtifactDeployer.java >artifact/xdocs changes.xml > Log: > PR: MPUBERJAR-5 > give ube