Should this be working with Artifacts? That way, this method could be in
ArtifactType.
>/**
> - * Currently this is just jars.
> + * Jars and ejbs.
> *
> * @param d
> * @return true if the given dependency belongs on the
> classpath
> */
>
> I think we'll need that for the memory leak. Jason would know
> better than
> me on that one.
>
My understanding of the memory leak means we really need to take all of what
is on HEAD, so the process for releasing RC1 will involve merging the fixes
from the stable branch down and releasing fr