Merged them down to HEAD? Manually, or with update -j?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2003 12:33 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/pro
t; > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> > maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/project Project.j ava
> >
> >
> > What's the difference between dependency.type and ArtifactType?
> > --
> > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> > Bl
it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Brett
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Brett Porter
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2003 4:01 PM
> > > To: 'Maven Developers List'
> > > Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> > > m
o be
> used again for a 1.0 vs 1.1 thing.
>
> - Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2003 1:28 PM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> > maven/
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/08/2003 11:25:55 AM:
> The marshaller/unmarshaller is already there, its just a matter of
modifying
> the affected stuff. I'll have a look at doing that depending on the
need.
Cool.
I think we'll need that for the memory leak. Jason would know better
August 2003 2:58 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/project Project.j ava
>
>
> What's the difference between dependency.type and ArtifactType?
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: http://b
Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2003 10:53 AM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> > maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/project Project.j ava
> >
> >
> > Bummer,
> >
> > I have a locally changed copy of Project.java that is waiting
m down to HEAD? Manually, or with update -j?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2003 12:33 PM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> > maven
ust 2003 11:23 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/project Project.j ava
>
>
> Yep, the use of betwixt vs xpp3 in HEAD is interesting.
>
> Maybe you could back port just the XPP3 marshall/demarshall
> from HEAD in
What's the difference between dependency.type and ArtifactType?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/08/2003 04:32:38 PM:
> Should this be working with Artifacts? That way, this method could be in
> A
Yep,
I did some of that yesterday with the cactus plugin and docs.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/08/2003 12:18:16 PM:
> > I think we'll need that for the memory leak. Jason would know
> > bet
"jar"). So no need to look
into
> it.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brett Porter
> > Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2003 4:01 PM
> > To: 'Maven Developers List'
> > Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> > ma
und for a while, and may need to be
used again for a 1.0 vs 1.1 thing.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 14 August 2003 1:28 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> maven/src/java/org/a
> From: Brett Porter
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2003 4:01 PM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/project Project.j ava
>
>
> I'm not sure at what point artifacts are constructed from the
> depend
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2003 3:44 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: cvs commit:
> maven/src/java/org/apache/maven/project Project.j ava
>
>
> Ok, will look into ithow will this change the code?
> --
> dIon
15 matches
Mail list logo
