iday, 15 July 2005 3:23 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: categorization for a project
I agree with using an existing categorization, but I don't think this
is something for 2.0, I'd better wait for 2.1.
Regards
On 7/14/05, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---
The Trove Software Map has gotten to a point where it changes very
infrequently.
I believe that the last update was to add Haskell as an available language.
/* joakim */
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
I agree with using an existing categorization, but I don't think this
is something for 2.0, I'd bette
age-
> From: Carlos Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 15 July 2005 3:23 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: categorization for a project
>
> I agree with using an existing categorization, but I don't think this
> is something for 2.0, I'd b
I agree with using an existing categorization, but I don't think this
is something for 2.0, I'd better wait for 2.1.
Regards
On 7/14/05, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I think it would be most useful to adopt an existing category hiera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think it would be most useful to adopt an existing category hierarchy,
and if possible either supply or refer to a web page that defines each
and gives some examples. One question: how will the syntax for
nested/sub-categories look? Will it be:
dat
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to broach the topic of augmenting the POM to allow a project to
categorize itself for the purposes of creating a meaningful index of
projects like can be found at http://java-source.net/.
Putting aside for the moment what the actual categories would be would
