Oh no please... I'm +1 to re-establish HEAD as the main development
branch.
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 August 2003 09:23
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: branch merge strate
s, right? :)
http://maven.apache.org/developer-activity-report.html
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, 18 August 2003 5:16 PM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: branch merg
ht lead on recent
commits, right? :) http://maven.apache.org/developer-activity-report.html
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 18 August 2003 5:16 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: branch merge strategy WA
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/08/2003 05:08:23 PM:
> Right so you are rolling back the core changes, but not the plugin
changes
> on HEAD?
There've been very few plugin changes on HEAD, and I've rolled them all
into the branch, so no, I'm not picking up plugin changes on HEAD as a
stuff and repairing
HEAD should work out ok.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 18 August 2003 4:48 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: branch merge strategy WAS: some cvs commit thread :)
>
>
&
hat we'd been talking about, but doing it as a once only and closing
> off
> > the branch, right?
> >
> > - Brett
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
about, but doing it as a once only and closing
off
> the branch, right?
>
> - Brett
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, 18 August 2003 4:18 PM
> > To: Maven Developers List
&g
gust 2003 4:18 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: branch merge strategy WAS: some cvs commit thread :)
>
>
> Nope,
>
> it's a merge of recent changes with Stable, except the core
> changes which
> will be reapplied later.
> --
>
Nope,
it's a merge of recent changes with Stable, except the core changes which
will be reapplied later.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/08/2003 04:09:10 PM:
> > Tomorrow Dion is going to move
> Tomorrow Dion is going to move the stable back to HEAD. We
> made an error in judgement. Then I will merge stuff back in
> as I have it.
>
Sounds like a good plan, but could you clarify "move stable back to HEAD"?
How exactly will that be done? Is this rolling back what is in HEAD now?
Sorr
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/08/2003 03:40:14 PM:
> On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 01:12, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Is there any consensus about merging the branch in this way?
> >
> > How are the developers currently building HEAD so that we can check
changes
> > are compiling in ok? I im
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 01:12, Brett Porter wrote:
> Is there any consensus about merging the branch in this way?
>
> How are the developers currently building HEAD so that we can check changes
> are compiling in ok? I imagine a certain subset of plugins are working?
Tomorrow Dion is going to move
Is there any consensus about merging the branch in this way?
How are the developers currently building HEAD so that we can check changes
are compiling in ok? I imagine a certain subset of plugins are working?
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
13 matches
Mail list logo
