On 4/3/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > After the 2.0.4 release I would like to merge what I have on the
> > embedder-refactor branch into the trunk.
>
> why wait? That's what trunk is for :D
+1
Milos
>
> - Brett
>
> -
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> After the 2.0.4 release I would like to merge what I have on the
> embedder-refactor branch into the trunk.
why wait? That's what trunk is for :D
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
Brett Porter wrote:
Another positive for this: it would enable us to use Continuum to run
the integration tests on a particular version of Maven via the embedder,
taking us one step closer to eliminating ci.sh.
Absolutely. It's archetype and embedder this week so I'll try to start
something th
Another positive for this: it would enable us to use Continuum to run
the integration tests on a particular version of Maven via the embedder,
taking us one step closer to eliminating ci.sh.
- Brett
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to float the idea of using the embedder for the ITs. I
Can we somehow add a mode to the embedder, or a wrapper around it, so
that forking an m2 instance instead is just configuration?
That way the default can be fast via the embedder, but the others
possible for release testing.
- Brett
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>>
>>> -Origin
Vincent Massol wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vendredi 31 mars 2006 04:29
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Using the embedder for ITs
Hi,
Just wanted to float the idea of using the embedder for the ITs. It's
been discussed before but no
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: vendredi 31 mars 2006 04:29
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Using the embedder for ITs
>
> Hi,
>
> Just wanted to float the idea of using the embedder for the ITs. It's
> been discussed before but now I
