I'll try to fix whatever's ailing the simian plugin tomorrow.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/12/2003 12:19:55 PM:
> > On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 19:39, Brett Porter wrote:
> > > It works now. Your c
Just as a side note: Although the build of the Maven-branch was now claimed as
successfull I found following issue in the build log:
[exec] +
[exec] | Building Maven Ashkelon Plug-in
[exec] | Memory: 15M/15M
[exec] +
Brett Porter wrote on Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:08 PM:
> IS everything in ../maven-plugins?
No, it is not. I only had the three plugins below checked out for further examination
and development.
> Is there a
> build.properties file overriding some property?
>
> You are only attempting to bu
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 17:52, Brett Porter wrote:
> > > Except that there are two setup steps now instead of one.
> >
> > Sorry I'm missing something, what are the two setups?
>
> Need to checkout maven, then maven-plugins, then set the properties
> appropriately if you didn't use the defaults.
Y
> > Except that there are two setup steps now instead of one.
>
> Sorry I'm missing something, what are the two setups?
Need to checkout maven, then maven-plugins, then set the properties
appropriately if you didn't use the defaults.
> No, as part of the bootstrap you have to check out modules.
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 17:27, Brett Porter wrote:
> > All the plugins are in ../maven-plugins and the location
> > specified is control in the project.properties in the core
> > Maven build.
>
> I know - I'm trying to find out where Jorg has something screwy because it
> works for everyone else.
> All the plugins are in ../maven-plugins and the location
> specified is control in the project.properties in the core
> Maven build.
I know - I'm trying to find out where Jorg has something screwy because it
works for everyone else.
>
> > You are only attempting to build with these plugins:
bootstrapping, and using HEAD.
> - Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 8:02 PM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: Using maven HEAD
> >
> >
> > Hi Brett,
>
bootstrap-required plugins out of the core was not
such a great idea...
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 8:02 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Using maven HEAD
>
>
> Hi
Hi Brett,
Brett Porter wrote on Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:40 AM:
> It works now. Your changes reintroduced changelog to the
> bootstrap, and it has been broken offline/behind firewalls
> for a while. I removed the offending test for reasons given
> in the commit.
>
> I'm now testing 1_0-branc
Brett,
I've just tried again CVS HEAD and it works fine now.
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 December 2003 08:19
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Using maven HEAD
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 December 2003 00:32
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Using maven HEAD
>
> Vincent, are you offline/behind a firewall? There's a bug in the
changelog
> plug
> On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 19:39, Brett Porter wrote:
> > It works now. Your changes reintroduced changelog to the bootstrap,
> > and it has been broken offline/behind firewalls for a
> while. I removed
> > the offending test for reasons given in the commit.
> >
> > I'm now testing 1_0-branch, but
ch, but I suspect it will be fine too now.
Coolio.
> - Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 11:06 AM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: Using maven HEAD
>
Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 11:06 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Using maven HEAD
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 18:16, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Confirmed problem for 1.1-SNAPSHOT. The vast majori
trap?
> - Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brett Porter
> > Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 9:07 AM
> > To: 'Maven Developers List'
> > Subject: RE: Using maven HEAD
> >
> >
> > No, this isn't the case. H
unit tests shouldn't be testing stuff like
that anyway.
Eric wins the "I broke the bootstrap" award for today :)
Cheers,
Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter
> Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 10:16 AM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject:
s between old
> configs and the new bootstrap Jason dropped in, so I'd
> recommend trying it with a clean checkout, $MAVEN_HOME, and
> $MAVEN_HOME_LOCAL.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAI
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 4:28 AM
> > To: 'Maven Developers List'
> > Subject: RE: Using maven HEAD
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> >
heckout, $MAVEN_HOME, and $MAVEN_HOME_LOCAL.
Cheers,
Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2003 4:28 AM
> To: 'Maven Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Using maven HEAD
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 December 2003 17:47
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Using maven HEAD
>
> On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 11:38, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Has anyone
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 11:38, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone tried to build a clean HEAD and then to manually build a
> plugin project?
You realize HEAD is now the RC2_UNSTABLE code? You sure you're not
meaning to build the 1.0 branch?
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>
> -
22 matches
Mail list logo