Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/03/2004 12:55:34 PM:
> Plugins are released independantly, and while Maven comes bundled with
the
> latest set and new features are regularly added, you are welcome to use
your
> own stable set, and enforce that by plugin dependencies in project.xml.
On Monday 15 March 2004 09:55, Brett Porter wrote:
Dion, Brett...
> This has been the focus for about 6 months.
:o)
> In terms of core, RC2 is basically RC1 with bugfixes and internal clean up.
> The current road map for 1.0 has no featuritis :) All new features get
> pushed to maven 1.1. Every
Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/03/2004 12:41:00 PM:
> On Monday 15 March 2004 08:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > As part of the ongoing process of decoupling the core, I think we
should
> > split the jelly tags out from the maven cvs repository into a
maven-tags
> > repository.
immutability of properties - just change them to )
Cheers,
Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 15 March 2004 12:41 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Suggestions for decoupling the core
>
>
> On Monda
> For my curiosity, reason for -1 on the werkz additions (not
> that I was
> thinking about it, but)
Its (unfortunately) very much tied into the way the plugin manager works and
vice-versa. And it'll disappear (or be much thinner) in maven2 anyway, as
none of the plugin handling is tied to J
On Monday 15 March 2004 08:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As part of the ongoing process of decoupling the core, I think we should
> split the jelly tags out from the maven cvs repository into a maven-tags
> repository.
Hi,
I am using Maven only because Avalon decided at some point to adapt it, a
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/03/2004 12:04:02 PM:
> +0 to doing it for the maven: tags, -1 for the werkz additions (which I
> don't think you are referring to anyway).
For my curiosity, reason for -1 on the werkz additions (not that I was
thinking about it, but)
> There may
+0 to doing it for the maven: tags, -1 for the werkz additions (which I
don't think you are referring to anyway).
There may be a problem here anyway because of the classloaders - so if they
are split, I'm not sure if you can use different versions across projects.
I'm ok with this happening if th
