On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 02:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I completely agree that standards are so much better then custom made
> solutions. That is the reason why we are investigating the use of Maven
> in the first place. But we simply have got no choice but to use a
> completely custom repos
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 02:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jason,
>
> > Maybe you should think about what your company policy is. What is your
> > company policy on the use of software components? Do you use your own
> > standard or something like a J2EE or Avalon standard? I think in most
> > cases
> Jason,
>
> > Maybe you should think about what your company policy is. What is your
> > company policy on the use of software components? Do you use your own
> > standard or something like a J2EE or Avalon standard? I think in most
> > cases people gravitate toward a standard. As developers we d
> > > The layout in repository was intentionally fixed. There
> > > are good reasons for that.
> > > I think that support for other protocols than file:// and
> > > http:// can be considered if there will be more users
> > > demanding it.
> > > If you want to use ftp:// you can rise an issue in J
Jason,
> Maybe you should think about what your company policy is. What is your
> company policy on the use of software components? Do you use your own
> standard or something like a J2EE or Avalon standard? I think in most
> cases people gravitate toward a standard. As developers we demand
> stan
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 08:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The layout in repository was intentionally fixed. There are good reasons
> for
> > that.
> > I think that support for other protocols than file:// and http:// can be
> > considered
> > if there will be more users demanding it.
> > If you wa
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Setting up Maven-New
>
>
> > The layout in repository was intentionally fixed. There are good reasons
>
> The layout in repository was intentionally fixed. There are good reasons
for
> that.
> I think that support for other protocols than file:// and http:// can be
> considered
> if there will be more users demanding it.
> If you want to use ftp:// you can rise an issue in JIRA.
>
> I personally th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Setting up Maven-New
>
>
> > > In particular because I have seen better decomposition allowing me to
>
> > In particular because I have seen better decomposition allowing me to
> > e.g. extend the Project class and parse the project.xml myself.
> >
> Certainly there are side effects of the decomposition made in maven-new
> which might result in such temptation to "personalize" your instance
> of mav
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Setting up Maven-New
>
>
> I know that Maven new is not really usable yet,
I would say: it is real
: Setting up Maven-New
AFAIK: maven-new is not yet usable.
Michal
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Setting up Maven-New
>
>
> Can someone guide m
AFAIK: maven-new is not yet usable.
Michal
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Setting up Maven-New
>
>
> Can someone guide me through the process of setting up and using
> M
13 matches
Mail list logo
