Mark R. Diggory wrote:
I'm going to cc this discussion onto infrastructure. I think it is a
valid topic which we need to address there in more detail.
You seem right on target with your e-mails. At least your understanding
of the situation matches mine :-D. In review...
1) we don't want "snapshot
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
1.) do not allow any interim content into www/dist. Interm content gets
placed under cvs.apache.org/repository. This gives us a means to allow
testing of interim content while not having all the mirrors (including
ibibilio and the archive) get flooded wit
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Well that's perfectly fine, they are in complete control of what goes
>into the directories we sync to ibiblio. At apache all committers have
>access to the directory that goes to ibiblio. I started rejecting
>requests to push Apache artifacts to Ibiblio
I'm going to cc this discussion onto infrastructure. I think it is a
valid topic which we need to address there in more detail.
Infrastructure, please review this posting before responding to this
subject:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/39469
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sat,
On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 21:03, Brett Porter wrote:
> I don't know very much about cvs.apache.org/repository.
>
> What I was suggesting was that snapshots that we want to keep should go to
> /dist/java-repository (which is what happens now).
Cool, that's all that's needed then. Whatever a projects w
I don't know very much about cvs.apache.org/repository.
What I was suggesting was that snapshots that we want to keep should go to
/dist/java-repository (which is what happens now).
- Brett
Quoting Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 19:46, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> > Nigh
On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 19:46, Brett Porter wrote:
> Nightly builds go to http://cvs.apache.org/repository, which is something we
> don't do at the moment, and something I don't think needs to be synced out to
> the mirrors. My understanding is that the ASF for legal reasons needs a PMC vote
> on a
That link describes http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/, which we do
publish releases to, and occasionally snapshots (milestone type snapshots). This
syncs to ibiblio and more.
Nightly builds go to http://cvs.apache.org/repository, which is something we
don't do at the moment, and somethin
eing stuck behind firewalls or whatnot.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:26 PM
> > To: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: RE: Repository for snapshots
> >
> > On Fri, 2004-07
me, users that want to be in the bleeding edge
can add cvs.apache.org to their project.properties list of repos.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 9:26 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Repository
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 12:20, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> It's more a political question. AFAIK that repository shouldn't be sync to
> ibiblio, e.g. the Struts team has released version 1.2.1 but as long as it
> hasn't been voted as a public release they told me that it mustn't be
> uploaded to ibiblio,
004 3:42 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Repository for snapshots
>
> On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 09:33, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've read recently a mail about an apache repository for non public
> > releases at http://cvs.apache.org/reposit
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 09:33, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've read recently a mail about an apache repository for non public releases
> at http://cvs.apache.org/repository/, not mirrored to ibiblio, that we
> (maven-plugins developers) don't use.
>
> I suggest setting it up so we can deploy S
13 matches
Mail list logo
