[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 28 novembre 2007 14:18
> To: Maven Developers List
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Relocation on a different version
>
> Gilles Scokart wrote:
> > Yes, I understand that someone decided to rename the version number.
> >
> &
Gilles Scokart wrote:
> Yes, I understand that someone decided to rename the version number.
>
> My problem is that I don't know how to consider the version number in the
> conflict resolution. If I consider the
> version number of the relocated module or the version number of the 'target
> of
Carlos
> > Sanchez
> > Sent: mercredi 28 novembre 2007 11:40
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Maven Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Relocation on a different version
> >
> > that was because it was published under two different versions, so one
> > wa
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Relocation on a different version
>
> that was because it was published under two different versions, so one
> was relocated to the correct one. Not common though
>
> On Nov 28, 2007 6:38 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTE
that was because it was published under two different versions, so one
was relocated to the correct one. Not common though
On Nov 28, 2007 6:38 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As there is no answer in the repository list, maybe I will have more chance
> on the maven list. Sorry f
As there is no answer in the repository list, maybe I will have more chance on
the maven list. Sorry for the
cross-post.
Is there anyone who can explain why it is allowed to relocate a module to an
other revision number? And how it is
supposed to work with conflict resolution?
Thanks,
Gilles
