If time is an issue, that usually means a few committers need to step
up from the user fold
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:05:21 +1000, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> This wasn't my point.
>
> I'm not discouraging regular releases - I think that's great.
>
> I had a problem wi
Guys,
This wasn't my point.
I'm not discouraging regular releases - I think that's great.
I had a problem with there being 10 issues in JIRA not getting any
attention before a release. Vincent didn't have time to fix it (which we
can all relate to), and the single feature in the release was more
That's a very good point, I totally agree.
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 04:16, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> 2. If an open source project doesn't release new versions of it's
> products, there will be hesitation amongst volounters (who are not
> committers) to contribute code.
-
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 05:02, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Ideally yes, I agree with you. But if we do in our current state (i.e.
> committers involved, etc), it'll never happen. Or it will but only once a
I agree with Vincent. It's really frustrating when the CVS code has
something you need, but it tak
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mercredi 13 octobre 2004 01:37
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Release of Checkstyle plugin v2.5
>
> > I have pondered this. In the end, I didn't see any reason not to re
I agree with Vincent here. There are a couple of reasons for this:
1. I'm a big fan of "release small, release often". This methodology
works very well if you have a smothly working infrastructure for
building, testing and release, which is the case in Maven as well as
most Apache products. This
> I have pondered this. In the end, I didn't see any reason not to release as:
>
> 1/ It had an important new feature (the support for checkstyle suppressions
> filter)
> 2/ I think it's better to release than not to release in general (the last
> release was 5 months old which is a long time)
> 3
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 12 octobre 2004 23:09
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: Release of Checkstyle plugin v2.5
>
> Vincent,
>
> I saw the release went out - do you have a specific reas
Vincent,
I saw the release went out - do you have a specific reason for needing
to cut the release so urgently?
if it was http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-617, I think the
timestamped plugin snapshot I suggested was a better alternative.
- Brett
Brett Porter wrote:
I'm -0.
There aren't real
I'm -0.
There aren't really a lot of new features, but there are 10 quite
similar unfixed bugs in JIRA. I'd prefer as many of them to be knocked
off first.
That said, I'm not volunteering to make the fixes, so if there's a
pressing reason to get those additions out there, then go ahead.
Releas
+1 for me.
Arnaud
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 11 octobre 2004 22:14
> À : 'Maven Developers List'
> Objet : Release of Checkstyle plugin v2.5
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release the checkstyle plugin v2.5. If nobody objects, I'll do
11 matches
Mail list logo
