RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-19 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 June 2003 22:01 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin [snip] > > I think we're talking about the same thing. You can have a jelly taglib &g

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Michal Maczka
> > -Original Message- > > From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 18 June 2003 21:13 > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin > > > > > > > This already exists in Ant: it'

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Vincent Massol
hanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 June 2003 21:40 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[E

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Michal Maczka
> -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:46 PM > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mic

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 June 2003 21:13 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin > > > > This already exists in Ant: it's called > > (http://ant.apache.org/ma

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Michal Maczka
> This already exists in Ant: it's called > (http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/manifest.html). And you can use > it from java too... :-) It weights 37K and contains lots of useful code. > Why start reimplementing it again? > It's about different thing. There is no central place in maven whi

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 June 2003 12:44 > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin > > > > > > > > > > > > What's so magical in an

Re: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Colin Sampaleanu
Michal Maczka wrote: ... Last time I am asking: Does anybody has something against building war ___always__ in two distinct steps? a) copying to build area (somewhere in target/ ) b) making a jar archive Yes, this is the best way to do it. If your servlet engine can use exploded webapps it

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Michal Maczka
> > > > > > > What's so magical in ant war task? > > It's written, fully supports the war model and has gone through lots of > testing. > OK I agree. But if we all have all files in given folder and we just want to archive it why we should care? It's just fairly simple thing. Do we need realy w

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Michal Maczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's so magical in ant war task? Nothing. I would say, that I never used it before maven - jar was just fine for me. > And personally I think that as much as possible of > the code should be done > in pure java - not in jelly with help of ant.

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 June 2003 11:20 > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vincent Massol [mail

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Michal Maczka
> -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:33 AM > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michal

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Michal Maczka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 June 2003 10:01 > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin > > Yes. > I am still working on deployer. > That's the art which I

Re: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Rafal Krzewski
Michal Maczka wrote: > Does anybody has something against building war ___always__ in two distinct > steps? > > a) copying to build area (somewhere in target/ ) > b) making a jar archive Go for it - it seems to simplify things, and people might want to run their application off that "explode

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-18 Thread Michal Maczka
. Michal > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:32 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: Recent changes in war plugin > > By this do you mean the war plugin?? > -- > dIon Gillard, M

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-17 Thread dion
By this do you mean the war plugin?? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Michal Maczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/06/2003 08:21:41 PM: > Thanks for pointing that! > I also realized that I did this cha

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-17 Thread Michal Maczka
It was mistake! will fix that Michal > -Original Message- > From: Kurt Schrader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 6:36 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: Recent changes in war plugin > > > I thought that we voted on this and

Re: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-17 Thread Kurt Schrader
I thought that we voted on this and decided that a war qould remained unversioned for easy deployment, but there would be a property to switch it to a versioned war. I am still -1 on making a versioned war the default behavior. -Kurt On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Konstantin Priblouda wrote: > I'm not sur

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-17 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Michal Maczka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for pointing that! > I also realized that I did this change (bit > unintentionally) I was sure you did it :) cvs log does not lie :) > Any other problems with the plugin? not at the moment > BTW: > > This plugin has not yet reached "releas

Re: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-17 Thread Rafal Krzewski
Konstantin Priblouda wrote: > I'm not sure that war artifact always needs version > name on it. Well, from one point of view it would be > nice to have versioned one if we are assembling ear. > > But from other point of view if we just assemble web > app > versioned war is not cool... IMO a war s

RE: Recent changes in war plugin

2003-06-17 Thread Michal Maczka
Thanks for pointing that! I also realized that I did this change (bit unintentionally) Not sure either if it should stay for release. Any other problems with the plugin? BTW: This plugin has not yet reached "release quality". I still need to work on it before beta-10 is out.. mm > -Orig