RE: rc1 release *does* report itself as rc1-SNAPSHOT

2003-09-29 Thread Brett Porter
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 29 September 2003 10:33 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: rc1 release *does* report itself as rc1-SNAPSHOT > > > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 03:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I've downloaded the zip and tried it out.

Re: rc1 release *does* report itself as rc1-SNAPSHOT

2003-09-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 03:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've downloaded the zip and tried it out. > > Do we bother fixing this? How about we just forge onward and try to release another rc this week? I think Brett wants to commit some code that merges some code I originally put in CVS with what w

RE: RC1 announcement contents

2003-09-28 Thread Vincent Massol
> -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 September 2003 05:40 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: RC1 announcement contents > > On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot

Re: RC1 announcement contents

2003-09-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 22:17, bob mcwhirter wrote: > > I'm in no rush, you want to start? Is there a way to query JIRA for > > fixes between now and the last release? > > Yah, if you've used the Roadmap feature appropriately, and marked > bugs with the correct fixed-in-version, then yes, it's super

Re: RC1 announcement contents

2003-09-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/09/2003 11:39:22 AM: > Do you mean that you're in no rush to do the release? Right, if you think the fix list is important then put that in and then I'll cut the release. > I thought you'd asked for no commits

Re: RC1 announcement contents

2003-09-28 Thread bob mcwhirter
> I'm in no rush, you want to start? Is there a way to query JIRA for > fixes between now and the last release? Yah, if you've used the Roadmap feature appropriately, and marked bugs with the correct fixed-in-version, then yes, it's super-easy. Dunno if we have. -bob --

Re: RC1 announcement contents

2003-09-28 Thread dion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/09/2003 11:39:22 AM: > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2003 11:20:12 AM: > > > On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Can we please include a list of fixed bugs and outstanding ones in the > rc1 > > > announcement? > > > > +1

Re: RC1 announcement contents

2003-09-28 Thread dion
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/09/2003 11:20:12 AM: > On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Can we please include a list of fixed bugs and outstanding ones in the rc1 > > announcement? > > +1 > > I'm in no rush, you want to start? Is there a way to query JIRA

Re: RC1 announcement contents

2003-09-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can we please include a list of fixed bugs and outstanding ones in the rc1 > announcement? +1 I'm in no rush, you want to start? Is there a way to query JIRA for fixes between now and the last release? > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consul

Re: RC1

2003-09-26 Thread Stephen McConnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 'maven demo' in avalon\merlin\platform\tutorials\hello did nothing, and there was no maven.xml file there, so I'm not sure where 'demo' is defined. You guessed the right actions - and the results are correct. Just for reference, the avalon:meta goal is generating

Re: RC1

2003-09-26 Thread dion
'maven demo' in avalon\merlin\platform\tutorials\hello did nothing, and there was no maven.xml file there, so I'm not sure where 'demo' is defined. maven avalon:meta generated a file and maven merlin:simluate downloads a ton of jar files and generates this: BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 4 min

Re: RC1

2003-09-26 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 00:17, Stephen McConnell wrote: > Jason: > > Just a point of confirmation - Avalon have two Maven plugins, one > dealing with automated generation of component meta-info and the second > supporting simulated component deployment. Currently these plugins are > located in the

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Stephen McConnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/09/2003 02:47:27 PM: Dion: I know this is really wimpy, but I have a beta-10 release running on my machine which is the release that is documeted under the respective Avalon products. I would prefer to maintain my en

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread dion
Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/09/2003 02:47:27 PM: > Dion: > > I know this is really wimpy, but I have a beta-10 release > running on my machine which is the release that is documeted > under the respective Avalon products. I would prefer to > maintain my environment relative

RE: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Brett Porter
Message- > From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 2:47 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: RC1 > > > > Dion: > > I know this is really wimpy, but I have a beta-10 release > running on my machine which is t

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Stephen McConnell
Dion: I know this is really wimpy, but I have a beta-10 release running on my machine which is the release that is documeted under the respective Avalon products. I would prefer to maintain my environment relative to beta-10 for the moment as I'm dealing with other user issues relative to that co

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Stephen McConnell
--Original Message- From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 2:18 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: RC1 Jason: Just a point of confirmation - Avalon have two Maven plugins, one dealing with automated generation of component meta-info and

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread dion
Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/09/2003 02:17:34 PM: > Jason: > > Just a point of confirmation - Avalon have two Maven plugins, one > dealing with automated generation of component meta-info and the second > supporting simulated component deployment. Currently these plugins are

RE: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Brett Porter
n Developers List > Subject: Re: RC1 > > > > > Jason: > > Just a point of confirmation - Avalon have two Maven plugins, > one dealing with automated generation of component meta-info > and the second supporting simulated component deployment. > Current

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Stephen McConnell
Jason: Just a point of confirmation - Avalon have two Maven plugins, one dealing with automated generation of component meta-info and the second supporting simulated component deployment. Currently these plugins are located in the Avalon CVS and binary downloads are maintained on the Apache mir

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 23:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sounds good to me. Cool, we have 3 +1s so maven-plugins is the official new home. > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > > > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/09/2003 04:

Re: RC1

2003-09-25 Thread dion
Sounds good to me. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/09/2003 04:49:45 AM: > Howdy, > > Vincent and I have decided to move the AspectJ plugin out of the core so > that it can have its own life and

RE: RC1 Issues completed - release imminent.

2003-09-22 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 01:44, Vincent Massol wrote: > dIon, > > I'd like to have some feedback on the new aspectj plugin I've committed > yesterday before we release rc1 (yeah, I know, it was very close to the > release...). At least one or 2 persons saying it works for them. That > shouldn't take

RE: RC1 Issues completed - release imminent.

2003-09-21 Thread Vincent Massol
dIon, I'd like to have some feedback on the new aspectj plugin I've committed yesterday before we release rc1 (yeah, I know, it was very close to the release...). At least one or 2 persons saying it works for them. That shouldn't take more than a day. Hey guys, come on, just give it a whirl! :-)

Re: RC1 release plans

2003-07-02 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
There are no patches. We must do it with explanations on dev eclipse site. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:31 PM Subject: Re: RC1 release plans > Are there patches

Re: RC1 release plans

2003-07-02 Thread dion
Are there patches for Maven-473? I couldn't see one... -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Work: http://www.multitask.com.au Wes Isberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/06/2003 10:42:48 AM: > Sorry, newbie protocol question wrt > > > 3) S

Re: RC1

2003-06-23 Thread Martin Skopp
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 14:57, Jason van Zyl wrote: > I'm going to keep plugging > away this weekend on some refactoring. I'm primarily interested in > eliminating the massive memory leak and some efficiency problems with > interpolation, plugin loading and inheritance. thanks a lot in advance

Re: RC1 release plans

2003-06-15 Thread Ben Walding
MAVEN-442 is now linked. You just have to fix it now :) I believe Jason is working on resolving the reactor memory leak, you might want to check in with him at some point. Brett Porter wrote: Hi Ben, Can you add MAVEN-442 to the RC1 bug? It also breaks a lot of reactor based builds. Sorry,

Re: RC1 release plans

2003-06-15 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Ben, Can you add MAVEN-442 to the RC1 bug? It also breaks a lot of reactor based builds. Sorry, I haven't come up with a fix for either 442 or 472 yet, but I'm working on it. I've posted my research on 472 to the issue in JIRA. Cheers, Brett Ben Walding wrote: (Committers: Can you funnel ch

Re: RC1 release plans

2003-06-12 Thread nick . minutello
>> After the scathing blame-storming attack by Nick (just kidding), ;-) I have been swimming against the email/work tide - and havent had a chance to respond. First of all, on behalf of many people: Hurrah IMO All bugs and feature requests should be entered in Jira - otherwise its very dif

Re: RC1 release plans

2003-06-10 Thread Wes Isberg
Sorry, newbie protocol question wrt > 3) Submit an issue and hope someone takes notice. No guarantees. I'd like to find a committer for Maven-473, but I assume that one should not email committers directly and that this mailing list is not the place to plead for attention (as I've just done). So