> -Original Message-
> From: Jerome Lacoste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Plugin properties suggestion
>
> On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:49, Eric Pugh wrote:
> > I like the idea..
>
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:49, Eric Pugh wrote:
> I like the idea..
me too
> Would the next logical step be to verify as well that
> anything in plugin.properties was listed in the properties.xml file? It
> seems that pretty much anything in plugin.properties should be documented.
sounds good t
I like the idea.. Would the next logical step be to verify as well that
anything in plugin.properties was listed in the properties.xml file? It
seems that pretty much anything in plugin.properties should be documented.
You could also apply the same logic to goals as well.
Eric
> -Original M
