On Monday November 13 2006 10:47 pm, Brett Porter wrote:
> On 14/11/2006, at 2:41 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > That's an "OK" temporary solution. The biggest problem with it is
> > that
> > you cannot generate a working eclipse project with that setup. "mvn
> > eclipse:eclipe" doesn't generate a
least 3 conflicting sources
of information.Where's the third? ;-)
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:41 PM
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
> Cc: Brett Porter
> Subject: Re: Plugin license inje
On 14/11/2006, at 2:41 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
That's an "OK" temporary solution. The biggest problem with it is
that
you cannot generate a working eclipse project with that setup. "mvn
eclipse:eclipe" doesn't generate a project that is importable into
eclipse.
I thought this had been fi
@maven.apache.org
Cc: Brett Porter
Subject: Re: Plugin license injection
On Monday November 13 2006 10:00 pm, Brett Porter wrote:
> Jason was going to whip something up. I believe he'll be back in a
> couple of days and can answer then.
>
> You can copy the technique used in pmd/checkstyle,
On Monday November 13 2006 10:00 pm, Brett Porter wrote:
> Jason was going to whip something up. I believe he'll be back in a
> couple of days and can answer then.
>
> You can copy the technique used in pmd/checkstyle, at least for the
> files in the root directory if you are looking to move on it
Jason was going to whip something up. I believe he'll be back in a
couple of days and can answer then.
You can copy the technique used in pmd/checkstyle, at least for the
files in the root directory if you are looking to move on it now.
The full description is here: http://www.apache.org/le
