I'm not fussy about the syntax but I do not want to bind the filtering
to Ant.
Why don't we keep @...@ syntax by default, but allow configuration (as
does Ant). I think we can reuse the POM definition to configure Ant
filtersets for those that want to use it, but if we remove
and replace it wit
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 09:48, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> > > I don't have the full picture of what you're doing though...
> >
> > I'm trying to trace down the memory leak and sequentially going
> through
> > a list of suspect points of leakage.
>
> That's cool :-)
Yes, well I'm trying but so far
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 June 2003 15:47
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: New feature: filtering
>
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 09:39, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> > Filtering is working right now
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 09:39, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Filtering is working right now for runtime and test resources... We can
> get the release out the door (on this subject). I don't see how
> rewriting our filtering support and in addition writing some additional
> java code can help improve the
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 June 2003 15:24
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: New feature: filtering
>
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 04:44, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> > And you can re-use any of these w
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 04:44, Vincent Massol wrote:
> And you can re-use any of these without having to go through an XML
> script file of course. Why would you want to reinvent the wheel?
Because everytime I take this line of thought I end up spending
monumental amounts of time because I run into
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 June 2003 10:35
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: New feature: filtering
>
> On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 03:20, Brett Porter wrote:
> > > oh, ok. I thought you wanted to p
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 03:20, Brett Porter wrote:
> > oh, ok. I thought you wanted to put the filter in the POM... If it's
> > just the filtersets, then, yes I agree. However, I'm not sure I like the
> > format:
> >
> >
> >
> > my.filters
> > ${basedir}/../filters
> >
> > **/
Although I don't quite agree, I've applied it for now. The part that I
don't like is that copying will be done all the time when there are
filters, even if the file or the filter value have not changed...
This has always been an issue with ant filtering. The only option you
have is to set up some
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 June 2003 09:21
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: New feature: filtering
>
> > oh, ok. I thought you wanted to put the filter in the POM... If it's
> > just the fil
oh, ok. I thought you wanted to put the filter in the POM... If it's
just the filtersets, then, yes I agree. However, I'm not sure I like the
format:
my.filters
${basedir}/../filters
**/*.properties
my.filters
base.filters
...
[...]
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 June 2003 08:07
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: New feature: filtering
>
> > BTW, do you have any idea why the sample-filtering project in
> > plugin-builds/exampl
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 June 2003 07:21
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: New feature: filtering
>
> > Why is that? I never use the "overwrite" attribute and all my
filtering
> > work
BTW, do you have any idea why the sample-filtering project in
plugin-builds/examples does not work WRT filtering?
You've placed the "filtering" attribute on the "fileset" tag. It should
be on the "copy" tag.
Also, test-nofilter should contain "@testFilter@" so you can check it is
not replaced.
Why is that? I never use the "overwrite" attribute and all my filtering
work fine...
change a filter, but don't touch the file that will be filtered - Ant
(at least last time I checked) doesn't copy the file again, leaving it
with the old value.
BTW, do you have any idea why the sample-filtering
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 June 2003 06:59
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: New feature: filtering
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> This is great! However, there is one problem: you'll need to add
>
Hi Vincent,
This is great! However, there is one problem: you'll need to add
as well, as overwrite
needs to be enabled for filtering.
Also, I'd prefer to see filter loading incorporated into the POM.
my.filters
${basedir}/../filters
**/*.properties
17 matches
Mail list logo
