Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>I think it would be better not to mess with it right now. But it's a fine
>>goal for a cleaner bootstrap - the bootstrap ant task can just pull down the
>>JARs from the repo.
>
> The bootstrap can just run the reactor in ../maven-plugins instead of
> src/plugins-build. I wo
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 18:24, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Are the memory leaks completely gone in RC2_UNSTABLE as they
> > are in RC1_REFACTOR? If so then then that's a big cross
> > section I won't look at.
>
> I think there is still one leak in the project loading (caused by betwixt?)
> but is very
> Are the memory leaks completely gone in RC2_UNSTABLE as they
> are in RC1_REFACTOR? If so then then that's a big cross
> section I won't look at.
I think there is still one leak in the project loading (caused by betwixt?)
but is very minor - a few kb per project I think.
I can rebuild all of m
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 November 2003 00:01
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: Moving all plugins to maven-plugins
>
> On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 17:24, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Jason,
> >
>
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 17:24, Brett Porter wrote:
> Jason,
>
> I think it would be better not to mess with it right now. But it's a fine
> goal for a cleaner bootstrap - the bootstrap ant task can just pull down the
> JARs from the repo.
The bootstrap can just run the reactor in ../maven-plugins i
Jason,
I think it would be better not to mess with it right now. But it's a fine
goal for a cleaner bootstrap - the bootstrap ant task can just pull down the
JARs from the repo.
As far as what is different between the original branch and the new RC2
branch, diffs probably aren't going to help. Wh
