Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-06 Thread Jason Dillon
I said hope didn’t I? Glad it's an area everyone's thinking about though... :) John Allen -Original Message- From: Arnaud Bailly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 September 2006 16:24 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Maven central reporting API Jason van Zyl <[EMAI

RE: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-06 Thread John Allen
repository environment. I said hope didn’t I? Glad it's an area everyone's thinking about though... :) John Allen -Original Message- From: Arnaud Bailly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 September 2006 16:24 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Maven central reporting API Jas

Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-06 Thread Arnaud Bailly
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I was just commenting on the use of XML. If I were to design a pure > reporting Data API I would probably not use XML at all. I would > probably use find a format that would provide the fastest data > processing capabilities because I would like real-t

Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 6 Sep 06, at 9:39 AM 6 Sep 06, Arnaud Bailly wrote: Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: http://xradar.sourceforge.net/ Thank you for the pointer, really interesting tool. This is not the kind of thing I was thinking about but it might be an alternative, with the obvious advantage

Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-06 Thread Arnaud Bailly
Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > http://xradar.sourceforge.net/ > Thank you for the pointer, really interesting tool. This is not the kind of thing I was thinking about but it might be an alternative, with the obvious advantage of existing :-) BTW, I am not sure using a RDF database

Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 6 Sep 06, at 3:02 AM 6 Sep 06, Jason Dillon wrote: On 8/31/06, Arnaud Bailly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1. a base plugin to create initially the RDF database and populate it with basic pom's information 2. a modified compiler plugin to store source files structure information 3. a mo

Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-06 Thread Jason Dillon
On 8/31/06, Arnaud Bailly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1. a base plugin to create initially the RDF database and populate it with basic pom's information 2. a modified compiler plugin to store source files structure information 3. a modified surefire plugin to store test results in the graph

Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-04 Thread Arnaud Bailly
jallen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi John, > I'm afraid I not replying to answer your questions but I am very excited > that someone is taking this on! Encouraging posts are always welcomed :-) > > What I have found from promoting a low-cost (read open-source or cheap such > as JIRA/Confluen

Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-04 Thread Jimisola Laursen
Hi Arnaud, > To delve deeper into this, I am having a hard time finding maven's big > picture and unfortunately, > comments in code are rather fragmentary and barely useful (when they > exist). Is there a document on maven architecture somewhere ? Think > the answer is no, but asking anyway :-)

Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-04 Thread jallen
Arnaud Bailly-3 wrote: > > Hi, > A couple of weeks ago I posted a proposal about a centralized > reporting feature for maven that would allow easy aggregation of > information at whatever level is needed. This proposal is centered > around the idea of creating and maintaining a RDF database that

Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-04 Thread Arnaud Bailly
Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 2. How can I retrieve a mojo instance from another mojo in the same >> or a sub project ? > > I think the answer is that you can't. All plugin communication is > meant to happen through the project instance. > > We certainly need to find a way to make

Re: Maven central reporting API

2006-09-04 Thread Brett Porter
On 31/08/2006, at 7:44 PM, Arnaud Bailly wrote: Questions (which may be trivial) are: 1. Is there one mojo instance for each project in the hierarchy ? I think this is the case but I am not sure. The mojo is instantiated every time it is run (so yes, per project, but also per execution pe