RE: Maven and DamageControl

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
t > > > -Original Message- > > From: bob mcwhirter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2003 9:17 AM > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: RE: Maven and DamageControl > > > > > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Brett P

Re: Maven and DamageControl

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 17:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +1. > On all branches? I imagine that couldn't hurt, but I don't know if DC can distinguish yet. > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > > > > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

RE: Maven and DamageControl

2003-11-25 Thread Brett Porter
ers List > Subject: RE: Maven and DamageControl > > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Brett Porter wrote: > > > Never run DamageControl, but use CruiseControl all of the time. > > Couldn't it run on codehaus off an anon. checkout from Apache? I > > believe the s

Re: Maven and DamageControl

2003-11-25 Thread dion
+1. On all branches? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/11/2003 02:40:38 AM: > Howdy, > > As there will be a lot of activity in the coming weeks I wanted to get > DamageControl setup with Maven

RE: Maven and DamageControl

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
ed to augment the $CVSROOT here slightly so that DamageControl knows when commits happen. > Cheers, > Brett > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2003 5:45 AM > > To: Maven Developers List &

RE: Maven and DamageControl

2003-11-25 Thread bob mcwhirter
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Brett Porter wrote: > Never run DamageControl, but use CruiseControl all of the time. Couldn't it > run on codehaus off an anon. checkout from Apache? I believe the status > checks are reasonably lightweight, and only need be run once an hour or > less. Yah, it'd be an anonym

RE: Maven and DamageControl

2003-11-25 Thread Brett Porter
7;ll check out DamageControl now. Cheers, Brett > -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2003 5:45 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: Maven and DamageControl > > > On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 10:56

RE: Maven and DamageControl

2003-11-25 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 10:56, Vincent Massol wrote: > Big +1 I'm trying to get it setup with infrastructure but of course it's seen as a big deal. Big fat sigh. And another one. If it's not resolved in the next couple of days I'll ask Aslak and Jon for some help in getting Damage Control to take i

Re: Maven and DamageControl

2003-11-25 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1, while waiting continuum :-) Emmanuel - Original Message - From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:40 PM Subject: Maven and DamageControl > Howdy, > > As there will be a lot of activity in the comi

RE: Maven and DamageControl

2003-11-25 Thread Vincent Massol
Big +1 > -Original Message- > From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25 November 2003 16:41 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Maven and DamageControl > > Howdy, > > As there will be a lot of activity in the coming weeks I wanted to get > DamageControl setup with Maven