evelopers List
> Subject: Re: Maven 3 versions of the plugins
>
> The intention of the warning was to make it pretty clear that you're
> running with some risk. We have already agreed that the entire
> "parallel" feature is to be marked as "experimental" (altho
List
Subject: Re: Maven 3 versions of the plugins
The intention of the warning was to make it pretty clear that you're
running with some risk. We have already agreed that the entire
"parallel" feature is to be marked as "experimental" (although with the
explicit adding of @thread
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
Isn't the current solution noisy enough ?
+1, looks fine to me.
ti., 18.05.2010 kl. 13.32 -0500, skrev Paul Benedict:
Why would Maven allow parallel builds that are not thread-safe?
Simply because the absence of the @threadSafe annotation does not imply
that the
The intention of the warning was to make it pretty clear that you're
running with some risk. We have already agreed that the entire
"parallel" feature is to be marked as "experimental" (although with the
explicit adding of @threadSafe to the mojos I personally think regular
"parallel" is good for p
Why would Maven allow parallel builds that are not thread-safe?
Granted, it's the developer's choice to take the chance, but I just
don't see why it's beneficial to allow builds being potentially
corrupted unbeknownst to the builder.
2010/5/17 Arnaud Héritier :
> In m3 if you activate the // mode
In m3 if you activate the // mode and you have a plugin which isn't marked as
compatible you'll have a warning like that :
[WARNING] *
[WARNING] * Your build is requesting parallel execution, but project *
[WARNING] * contains t
I actually want to recommend something more formal inside of Maven. It
seems that some kind of rule should exist to force a minimum version.
Paul
2010/5/17 Martin Gainty :
>
> Hi Paul
>
>
>
> would a custom rule work?
> http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/enforcer-api/writing-a-custom-rule.html
>
>
Hi Paul
would a custom rule work?
http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/enforcer-api/writing-a-custom-rule.html
?
Martin Gainty
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten S
