Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/08/2003 08:20:58 AM:
> I'm confused.
Bummer, I was trying to not confuse people.
> My understanding is:
> - So RC1_STABLE is the branch people should be using if they want to
build
> and use latest maven and do bits and pieces development
Yes.
> - HE
> > - for RC1, all fixes on the branch will be merged down to HEAD
> That depends on whether the fixes for RC1 will require what's
> in HEAD or
> not.
I thought RC1 would come from HEAD because that's where the memory leak is
fixed. Aside from that, once maven is in RC mode, the number of big ch
Yes, there will be a merge.
It's going to be hard work, but the changes should be very isolate.
I'm all for the incremental update process you've described below.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Colin Sampaleanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote o
I'm confused.
My understanding is:
- So RC1_STABLE is the branch people should be using if they want to build
and use latest maven and do bits and pieces development
- HEAD will be full of upheaval like renaming all of the properties in
plugins and likely be unstable until RC1
- for RC1, all fixes
Are you expecting that this will be merged back into HEAD, or HEAD
merged into this in the future? Unfortuntately I think your chance of
merging 2 diverged branches (where ongoing work has gone on in both)
with CVS is next to nil. What is probably more realistic is for Jason
or whoever to do
