Hi,
What is the status of this, was a (Codehaus) project created?
Thanks,
Arent-Jan
Jason van Zyl-2 wrote:
>
> Ok, so I won't bother trying to find the exact point at which the
> license changed and take the tag for the 3.2.3.
>
> I'll just create a project at Codehaus unless someone wants
I've also had to patch it once - if there is a fork of it I may also use
or contribute.
James
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 06:02 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> On 14/04/2008, at 12:20 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > Anyone interested in forking it and maintaining the version that was
> > not GPL?
>
> I
List
Subject: Re: Java Service Wrappers unfortunate license change
The license change was at rev 1384 and the 3.2.3 release was at 1235 so
we
may want to also grab 1383 and review the change history in between. It
looks like there are quite a few changes in there so some of them may be
worth
The license change was at rev 1384 and the 3.2.3 release was at 1235 so we
may want to also grab 1383 and review the change history in between. It
looks like there are quite a few changes in there so some of them may be
worth having.
Chris
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL P
Ok, so I won't bother trying to find the exact point at which the
license changed and take the tag for the 3.2.3.
I'll just create a project at Codehaus unless someone wants to put it
somewhere else.
On 13-Apr-08, at 1:11 PM, Chris Custine wrote:
I have been irritated about this and thinkin
I have been irritated about this and thinking the same thing for the past
week, so if a fork occurs I am willing to help maintain it and tweak it.
Honestly there isn't too much wrong with the current 3.2.3 version that I am
aware of, but I think we can improve on it none the less.
Thanks,
Chris
O
On 14/04/2008, at 12:20 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Anyone interested in forking it and maintaining the version that was
not GPL?
I'm continuing to use 3.2.3. I've had to patch it once [1], but I'm
not sure how much I'll need to work on a fork of it since that version
has been pretty stable.
On 13-Apr-08, at 10:34 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Apr 13, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I have contact Leif of JSW but have yet to get a response about the
license change.
Project that start using a commercially liberal license and then
switching long into the life of a
On Apr 13, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
I have contact Leif of JSW but have yet to get a response about the
license change.
Project that start using a commercially liberal license and then
switching long into the life of a project is wrong. If you want to
do the GPL/comme
